[Future] wxWindows subsystem??
-
- PureBasic Expert
- Posts: 2812
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
- Location: Portugal, Lisbon
- Contact:
[Future] wxWindows subsystem??
Can that be possible ?
that's a very big amount of work but would be nice.
in the past i made a nice tetris in Python + wxPython, very powerful.
:roll:
in the past i made a nice tetris in Python + wxPython, very powerful.
:roll:
No programming language is perfect. There is not even a single best language.
There are only languages well suited or perhaps poorly suited for particular purposes. Herbert Mayer
There are only languages well suited or perhaps poorly suited for particular purposes. Herbert Mayer
It's a lot of work adding wx to a prg language, and in case of PB you add (IMHO) nothing valuable to PB except WORK 
Look at FreeBASIC and see for yourself how much work you need to do for the headers alone - over 500K on header files
Adding wx to FB makes sense because there is no gui toolkit coming with it.
But with PureBASIC there is no need for it.
AFAIK every thing wx has to offer PB already has...
So I second what Fred said.
BTW: the same goes for SDL or GTK on Windows...
Nice to play with, but adds nothing new to PB because Fred has already done a layer of GUI or GFX functions.

Look at FreeBASIC and see for yourself how much work you need to do for the headers alone - over 500K on header files


Adding wx to FB makes sense because there is no gui toolkit coming with it.
But with PureBASIC there is no need for it.
AFAIK every thing wx has to offer PB already has...
So I second what Fred said.
BTW: the same goes for SDL or GTK on Windows...
Nice to play with, but adds nothing new to PB because Fred has already done a layer of GUI or GFX functions.
-
- Addict
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:52 pm
- Contact: