Do you wish to have more and better sound-commands in the next PureBasic-Version.
My wishlist for the next PB-Version is:
1. FFT
2. Multichannel soundplaying (DirectX)
3. Functions for capturing sounds
4. Intergrated mixersupport
5. Easier soundbuffermanipulation with pb-command.
More and better sound-comands?
- Hroudtwolf
- Addict

- Posts: 803
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:35 am
- Location: Germany(Hessen)
- Contact:
Re: More and better sound-comands?
Hroudtwolf wrote:Do you wish to have more and better sound-commands in the next PureBasic-Version.
My wishlist for the next PB-Version is:
1. FFT
2. Multichannel soundplaying (DirectX)
3. Functions for capturing sounds
4. Intergrated mixersupport
5. Easier soundbuffermanipulation with pb-command.
1. i think FFT would be nice but a bit hard to code! this feature could come later as i prefer that pure should support first doubles as type
2. i agree, that would be a really nice feature but fred has to code a mixing rotuine for this first before you can do this. happy coding fred
3. there must be an example source somewhere on the forum or purearea website!?
4. see first point
5. would be nice and could be very interested
- Hroudtwolf
- Addict

- Posts: 803
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:35 am
- Location: Germany(Hessen)
- Contact:
Some times ago, i made an audio-recorder based on the audio-capture functions provided by the Windows API ( Not DirectX or MCI like ). It was hard to made, but next it worked like a charm. Maybe it might be a good idea to make a userlib for recording audio.3. Functions for capturing sounds
viewtopic.php?t=7009
No programming language is perfect. There is not even a single best language.
There are only languages well suited or perhaps poorly suited for particular purposes. Herbert Mayer
There are only languages well suited or perhaps poorly suited for particular purposes. Herbert Mayer
