More and better sound-comands?

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.

Do you wish to have more and better sound-commands in the next PureBasic-Version.

Yes. I think so, too !
17
65%
No, I needn't it !
9
35%
 
Total votes: 26

User avatar
Hroudtwolf
Addict
Addict
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:35 am
Location: Germany(Hessen)
Contact:

More and better sound-comands?

Post by Hroudtwolf »

Do you wish to have more and better sound-commands in the next PureBasic-Version.


My wishlist for the next PB-Version is:

1. FFT
2. Multichannel soundplaying (DirectX)
3. Functions for capturing sounds
4. Intergrated mixersupport
5. Easier soundbuffermanipulation with pb-command.
Ralf
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Germany

Re: More and better sound-comands?

Post by Ralf »

Hroudtwolf wrote:Do you wish to have more and better sound-commands in the next PureBasic-Version.


My wishlist for the next PB-Version is:

1. FFT
2. Multichannel soundplaying (DirectX)
3. Functions for capturing sounds
4. Intergrated mixersupport
5. Easier soundbuffermanipulation with pb-command.

1. i think FFT would be nice but a bit hard to code! this feature could come later as i prefer that pure should support first doubles as type :)

2. i agree, that would be a really nice feature but fred has to code a mixing rotuine for this first before you can do this. happy coding fred :)

3. there must be an example source somewhere on the forum or purearea website!?

4. see first point ;)

5. would be nice and could be very interested
User avatar
Hroudtwolf
Addict
Addict
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:35 am
Location: Germany(Hessen)
Contact:

Post by Hroudtwolf »

I think ...my wishes for the next PureBasic are very important.
There is really much competition on basic-market.
User avatar
Flype
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1542
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: In a long distant galaxy

Post by Flype »

3. Functions for capturing sounds
Some times ago, i made an audio-recorder based on the audio-capture functions provided by the Windows API ( Not DirectX or MCI like ). It was hard to made, but next it worked like a charm. Maybe it might be a good idea to make a userlib for recording audio.
viewtopic.php?t=7009
No programming language is perfect. There is not even a single best language.
There are only languages well suited or perhaps poorly suited for particular purposes. Herbert Mayer
Post Reply