BBC Finally Admits Its Famous ‘Women Write Better Code’ Story Was Fake News
What does this mean?
As for me "nothing", like an original story too ^^ Should not be a difference between women or man if just counting a brain abilities. But they can be because of "prejudices" about females, etc, some of girls I know are using male accounts to avoid such communication problems, happening if others knowing their real sex (not only in programming).heartbone wrote: What does this mean?
1. It has nothing to do with PureBasic.heartbone wrote:(This has more to do with PureBasic than it does with peanut butter, so I took the liberty to post it here.)
BBC Finally Admits Its Famous ‘Women Write Better Code’ Story Was Fake News
What does this mean?
> The original BBC article, with headlines and content amended (from bbc.com)The BBC ECU wrote:...the headline was inaccurate.
Thomas Jefferson wrote:...the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them ... he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods & errors.
It's neither dogma nor doctrine, for heaven's sake. It's merely a quote.tj1010 wrote:Those wise quotes are always very Confucius-like and never have any real advice or wisdom just single-state advice which has all the likelihood to be irrelevant.
That's because she merely transcribed his work. Moreover, she never programmed a single line of code; just theorised.Keya wrote:...too much talk of Charles Babbage not enough of Ada
I'm not angry I was just pointing out how they aren't really good for showing how the other person is wrong or how you're more wise.. That's how they are almost always used..TI-994A wrote:It's neither dogma nor doctrine, for heaven's sake. It's merely a quote.tj1010 wrote:Those wise quotes are always very Confucius-like and never have any real advice or wisdom just single-state advice which has all the likelihood to be irrelevant.
No reason to get your panties in a twist.
Just quipping myself. Believe it or not, I've been on both sides of that unfortunate fence; especially with my wonderful disposition.tj1010 wrote:I'm not angry I was just pointing out how they aren't really good for showing how the other person is wrong or how you're more wise.. That's how they are almost always used..TI-994A wrote:It's neither dogma nor doctrine, for heaven's sake. It's merely a quote.tj1010 wrote:Those wise quotes are always very Confucius-like and never have any real advice or wisdom just single-state advice which has all the likelihood to be irrelevant.
No reason to get your panties in a twist.
If you had only seen the people I've heard use "Stupid is as stupid does" to other people. Especially the ones I've had to save by giving/"loaning" them money for bills in most cases where they made more than me from a job..
Been there and back!Keya wrote:did you just go there!?!?
Ok, these rich or successful people could be considered as "experimented", but are they wise ?tj1010 wrote:I'd like to hear one from Gates, Buffet, or Helu based on economics and sociology, or Jello Biafra on philosophy.. People with proven experience and not perspective from failure that might be able to save you from their mistakes..

Certainly not !djes wrote:Ok, these rich or successful people could be considered as "experimented", but are they wise ?
Where are you quoting "experimented" from?djes wrote:Ok, these rich or successful people could be considered as "experimented", but are they wise ?tj1010 wrote:I'd like to hear one from Gates, Buffet, or Helu based on economics and sociology, or Jello Biafra on philosophy.. People with proven experience and not perspective from failure that might be able to save you from their mistakes..
Sorry for my poor english, experienced is the right adjective for "People with proven experience", isn't it ?tj1010 wrote:Where are you quoting "experimented" from?djes wrote:Ok, these rich or successful people could be considered as "experimented", but are they wise ?tj1010 wrote:I'd like to hear one from Gates, Buffet, or Helu based on economics and sociology, or Jello Biafra on philosophy.. People with proven experience and not perspective from failure that might be able to save you from their mistakes..
Why not, it depends on what purpose you follow in life. I know good stories about beggars, some who were rich and became poor, some who were poor and became rich (good traders somehow), some who were rich to be poor, some who were poor to be rich, some who gets rich to be poor, some who gets poor to be rich. Surely, you could be happier to be rich, especially in good health, that money can't guarantee.tj1010 wrote:Maybe we should ask a person living on the streets of New York City what mentality typically works in negotiations?
Maybe you aren't conscious about what is free. Let's start with something common : firefighters are working for free. Enlarge : police is free. In fact, all whole countries (not especially services) are free. At this point, you say : false, it costs money, we pay taxes ! It's not exactly true. It costs energy, in form of work and goods. Before money was invented, you get social help from the others to fight disease, to help construct your house, to eat. This is work. And you get goods from ... Nature. Everything that you get from nature is free. Now, add hundred of years of "progress", and it's right that a lot of theses things are not "free" anymore. Especially things that are really complicated, like computers, vaccines, exotic foods... Are they really important ? Sure, some of them. Maybe less than a mother's love, but they could be useful anyway.tj1010 wrote:If we're going to dive in to the currency-is-evil thing, then just let me know where I can get the free stuff..
Well... I only know one or two, and they're not really friends. They certainly have a lot to learn from the people "making" less.tj1010 wrote:I won't bother pointing out all the ways the people who typically 'go there' will socially discriminate against people who make $1,000 or 1,000€ less than them..
There's a lot of terms handled like toys that aren't. Capitalism. Evil. Socialism. Communism. Republic. Thousand years of human thinking, debates, fights, progress, wars, achievements and climb-down. One side of the balance. In the other side, what ? A computer. That's what is wrong with capitalism. It overestimates some not really useful things, underestimate some others. To achieve this, it handles common vices, like envy. What is really important ?tj1010 wrote:A Mac Pro(deca core) for free because capitalism is evil? Hurry with the link before the socialism turns to communism or a republic..