Lethal Judgment 2 Benchmark tool

J. Baker · Post by **J. Baker** » Tue Jan 06, 2004 1:48 pm

2991 @ 640x480x16
Pent. lll 850mhz, 512MB Sdram, Geforce2 MX400, FSB 100mhz, Hard Disk 5400rpm, WIN XP

Num3 · Post by **Num3** » Tue Jan 06, 2004 8:32 pm

2992 - 640x480x32 <-- Record

2409 - 800x600x32
1871 - 1024x768x32

Win2k - DX9 - Gforce 2 MX400 64Mb - AMD Atlhon XP2000+

Manne · Post by **Manne** » Tue Jan 06, 2004 8:50 pm

2992 - 640x480x32 <-- Record

Not really

640*480*32 2990

Manne

lethalpolux · Post by **lethalpolux** » Tue Jan 06, 2004 9:56 pm

megalol

Manne · Post by **Manne** » Wed Jan 07, 2004 12:10 am

megalol

ups, i think it was an good idea for me to get some sleep.

Mark1Up · Post by **Mark1Up** » Wed Jan 07, 2004 12:51 am

Time to raise the bar

640x480x32 = 15,498

1280x1024x32 = 5,074

AMD 1700
512MB
ATI Radeon 9100 (64MB)
Win2K Pro (DX9)

Nice graphics btw,
Mark

cabaptista · Post by **cabaptista** » Wed Jan 07, 2004 1:12 am

1024x768x32 = 1545

NoteBook Compaq PresÃ¡rio 2516EA, Pentium IV 2.53Ghz, 704 Mb RAM, ATI Radeon IGP 45M, 64 Mb.

I think my computer could do it better, but i think it's not optimized !

Any Ideas for Optimizing it ?

Thanks in Advance.

blueznl · Post by **blueznl** » Wed Jan 07, 2004 12:16 pm

ah, forgot to run it in different resoultions... I'LL BE BACK...

J. Baker · Post by **J. Baker** » Wed Jan 07, 2004 1:42 pm

Mark1Up wrote:Time to raise the bar

640x480x32 = 15,498

1280x1024x32 = 5,074

AMD 1700
512MB
ATI Radeon 9100 (64MB)
Win2K Pro (DX9)

Nice graphics btw,
Mark

Nice

, I'm waiting on my Visiontek ATI Radeon 9100 (64MB). It's coming UPS today, can't wait. Been using a Geforce 2 MX400.

Num3 · Post by **Num3** » Wed Jan 07, 2004 9:55 pm

ATI Boards are better...

It's unfair to compair a 2 year old GFX board with them

@Cab, you can disable Vsync from DX to let the board pump at full speed and not be restricted to the monitor refresh rate, also try changing the clock frequencie to give out a few extra Mghz (very gently)

Gonna tuneup my board now!

Muahahah

cabaptista · Post by **cabaptista** » Thu Jan 08, 2004 12:08 am

Thank You Num3 For the Tip !

My Score Now : 1024x768x32 = 3406 !!!!!!
Very Good !

Mark1Up · Post by **Mark1Up** » Thu Jan 08, 2004 12:55 am

Another thing to try is to update your video card driver. This site is a good one for getting the latest.

http://www.guru3d.com

Mark

Max. · Post by **Max.** » Thu Jan 08, 2004 9:01 am

21137 @ 640x480x32
10726 @ 1024x768x32

Looks very nice & seems as if the ATI cards give you the edge in the benchmark...

blueznl · Post by **blueznl** » Thu Jan 08, 2004 4:59 pm

the difference in speed reported between ati and nvidia is more than one would expect, very strange this... my machine isn't a slouch (although i should kill virus scanner firewall etc. when running the test) but scores always stay around or below 3k

something in the code appearently appeals to ati cards

is there some specific code in the test that ati does better than nvidia? (running regular games / benchmarks has not shown any problems with my current setup thus far, so i'm somewhat puzzled

)

i had a machine with an ati card, but it behaved rather... unpredictable in my multi monitor setup, probably buggy drivers (6 months ago or so) so i settled for my current gforce, the next machine *will* have an ati card though, but that's still a little bit into the future

blueznl · Post by **blueznl** » Thu Jan 08, 2004 5:26 pm

did some checking on an older gforce256 on a p3-800, which is quite a standard card and machine: only part of the display gets shown, looks like there is an issue with waiting for the vertical blank or something like that? could this be in purebasic, or in the drivers?

PureBasic Forums - English

Lethal Judgment 2 Benchmark tool

My Result

Yes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :))))))))))))))))))))))))))