A better name?
- netmaestro
- PureBasic Bullfrog
- Posts: 8451
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:42 am
- Location: Fort Nelson, BC, Canada
A better name?
At the risk of getting flamed to flinders, I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that 'SpiderBasic' isn't the coolest name for a new product (no offense, Fred). I get the connection, Spider->Web->hey, internet! but is there an alternative that makes the same connection but sounds a bit cooler? How about 'BlackWidow'?
BERESHEIT
Re: A better name?
Venom
Tarantula
Not fond of the name either, but it is a hell of a lot better than monkey.
If I had the naming rights, it would have been PBWeb.
Tarantula
Not fond of the name either, but it is a hell of a lot better than monkey.
If I had the naming rights, it would have been PBWeb.
Best wishes to the PB community. Thank you for the memories. 
Re: A better name?
Web Enhanced Basic
or WEB for short
or WEB for short

Re: A better name?
SilkBasic or Basilk or Basilica. 

The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
Re: A better name?
WebGorilla
WebGibbon
WebChimpanzee
NetGorilla
NetGibbon
NetChimpanzee
WebGibbon
WebChimpanzee
NetGorilla
NetGibbon
NetChimpanzee
Re: A better name?
SheloBasic
Shelo = rope (similar to web), in Romani, the Indic language of the Gypsies
Also, the name of the spider in the Lord of the Rings is also embedded in the name (i.e. Shelob).
Another variation: CordeBasic.
Shelo = rope (similar to web), in Romani, the Indic language of the Gypsies
Also, the name of the spider in the Lord of the Rings is also embedded in the name (i.e. Shelob).

Another variation: CordeBasic.
Re: A better name?
Oh my! I hope none of you had (or will have) to name a child 
I think SpiderBasic is okay, PureBasicWeb is my favorite.

I think SpiderBasic is okay, PureBasicWeb is my favorite.
pb 5.11
Re: A better name?
Nothing wrong with the name Monkey at all, and I know the product, I have it, damn fine product too!Kuron wrote:Venom
Tarantula
Not fond of the name either, but it is a hell of a lot better than monkey.
If I had the naming rights, it would have been PBWeb.

PureBasic
Re: A better name?
I think naming products is the worst task, very difficult to get right as there are
so many opinions.
We should be focusing on how good the product is, it's just a name.
SpiderBasic is a fine name!
so many opinions.
We should be focusing on how good the product is, it's just a name.
SpiderBasic is a fine name!
PureBasic
Re: A better name?
I, too, think it is a good name.davido wrote:I think SpiderBasic is a good name!
The biggest challenge will be if you google "spider compiler" you end up with dozens of hits for tips and questions about writing your own web spider/crawler. (Plus an actual spider compiler itself, not written by Fred.) You also see SpiderMonkey, the scripting language.
...I guess what I am saying is that it is an overused name with other topics, and not original for writing code (with several direct and indirect competitors using the name spider). It would be terrible if Fred ended up in a pissing match with one of them over the name.
Re: A better name?
I'm with you, I don't like the name either.netmaestro wrote:At the risk of getting flamed to flinders, I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that 'SpiderBasic' isn't the coolest name for a new product (no offense, Fred). I get the connection, Spider->Web->hey, internet! but is there an alternative that makes the same connection but sounds a bit cooler? How about 'BlackWidow'?
There are so many creepy web spiders already crawling around the internet.
If I were a businessman, then I'd think about reinforcing the Pure brand not B.A.S.I.C..
So if I think of a better name, then I'll post it, for what good it'll do.
Keep it BASIC.
Re: A better name?
Well said. Pure should be in the name or something other than Spider, since that is an alert keyword for antivirus. For example, you would not want it to be called BotBasic!
Naming is a tough task as PureScript and PureJS are already taken.

Naming is a tough task as PureScript and PureJS are already taken.
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
Re: A better name?
Using a sexual innuendo as a product name is never a good idea.dman wrote:Nothing wrong with the name Monkey at all, and I know the product, I have it, damn fine product too!
Best wishes to the PB community. Thank you for the memories. 
Re: A better name?
Well that's at least two of us who feel that way.skywalk wrote:Well said. Pure should be in the name or something other than Spider, since that is an alert keyword for antivirus. For example, you would not want it to be called BotBasic!![]()
Naming is a tough task as PureScript and PureJS are already taken.

Assuming that a product name change for PureBasic in not in the immediate future,
then not only should Pure be in the name of this new product,
but if possible the name should do a good job in helping to define the product.
After a moderate bout of ruminating I conjured the descriptor "Browser Application Language" to describe the function of the new product.
The total product including the language compiler, debugger, IDE, examples, and documentation could be considered the BAL Luxury Suite.
It follows then, that this new product should be called PureBALLS.

Keep it BASIC.