A better name?

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
User avatar
netmaestro
PureBasic Bullfrog
PureBasic Bullfrog
Posts: 8451
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:42 am
Location: Fort Nelson, BC, Canada

A better name?

Post by netmaestro »

At the risk of getting flamed to flinders, I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that 'SpiderBasic' isn't the coolest name for a new product (no offense, Fred). I get the connection, Spider->Web->hey, internet! but is there an alternative that makes the same connection but sounds a bit cooler? How about 'BlackWidow'?
BERESHEIT
User avatar
Kuron
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1626
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:51 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: A better name?

Post by Kuron »

Venom
Tarantula

Not fond of the name either, but it is a hell of a lot better than monkey.

If I had the naming rights, it would have been PBWeb.
Best wishes to the PB community. Thank you for the memories. ♥️
Foz
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: A better name?

Post by Foz »

Web Enhanced Basic

or WEB for short :)
User avatar
skywalk
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4213
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: A better name?

Post by skywalk »

SilkBasic or Basilk or Basilica. 8)
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
User avatar
Danilo
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3036
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 8:26 am
Location: Planet Earth

Re: A better name?

Post by Danilo »

WebGorilla
WebGibbon
WebChimpanzee

NetGorilla
NetGibbon
NetChimpanzee
User avatar
Demivec
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4266
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Utah, USA

Re: A better name?

Post by Demivec »

SheloBasic

Shelo = rope (similar to web), in Romani, the Indic language of the Gypsies

Also, the name of the spider in the Lord of the Rings is also embedded in the name (i.e. Shelob). :wink:

Another variation: CordeBasic.
gnasen
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:21 am

Re: A better name?

Post by gnasen »

Oh my! I hope none of you had (or will have) to name a child :P

I think SpiderBasic is okay, PureBasicWeb is my favorite.
pb 5.11
davido
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1890
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:04 pm
Location: Uttoxeter, UK

Re: A better name?

Post by davido »

I think SpiderBasic is a good name!

Looks like a great product, too.
DE AA EB
dman
User
User
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:10 pm

Re: A better name?

Post by dman »

Kuron wrote:Venom
Tarantula

Not fond of the name either, but it is a hell of a lot better than monkey.

If I had the naming rights, it would have been PBWeb.
Nothing wrong with the name Monkey at all, and I know the product, I have it, damn fine product too! :D
PureBasic
dman
User
User
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:10 pm

Re: A better name?

Post by dman »

I think naming products is the worst task, very difficult to get right as there are
so many opinions.

We should be focusing on how good the product is, it's just a name.

SpiderBasic is a fine name!
PureBasic
User avatar
Tenaja
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:15 pm

Re: A better name?

Post by Tenaja »

davido wrote:I think SpiderBasic is a good name!
I, too, think it is a good name.

The biggest challenge will be if you google "spider compiler" you end up with dozens of hits for tips and questions about writing your own web spider/crawler. (Plus an actual spider compiler itself, not written by Fred.) You also see SpiderMonkey, the scripting language.

...I guess what I am saying is that it is an overused name with other topics, and not original for writing code (with several direct and indirect competitors using the name spider). It would be terrible if Fred ended up in a pissing match with one of them over the name.
User avatar
heartbone
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2013 1:55 pm
Location: just outside of Ferguson

Re: A better name?

Post by heartbone »

netmaestro wrote:At the risk of getting flamed to flinders, I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that 'SpiderBasic' isn't the coolest name for a new product (no offense, Fred). I get the connection, Spider->Web->hey, internet! but is there an alternative that makes the same connection but sounds a bit cooler? How about 'BlackWidow'?
I'm with you, I don't like the name either.
There are so many creepy web spiders already crawling around the internet.
If I were a businessman, then I'd think about reinforcing the Pure brand not B.A.S.I.C..
So if I think of a better name, then I'll post it, for what good it'll do.
Keep it BASIC.
User avatar
skywalk
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4213
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: A better name?

Post by skywalk »

Well said. Pure should be in the name or something other than Spider, since that is an alert keyword for antivirus. For example, you would not want it to be called BotBasic! :lol:
Naming is a tough task as PureScript and PureJS are already taken.
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
User avatar
Kuron
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1626
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:51 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: A better name?

Post by Kuron »

dman wrote:Nothing wrong with the name Monkey at all, and I know the product, I have it, damn fine product too! :D
Using a sexual innuendo as a product name is never a good idea.
Best wishes to the PB community. Thank you for the memories. ♥️
User avatar
heartbone
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2013 1:55 pm
Location: just outside of Ferguson

Re: A better name?

Post by heartbone »

skywalk wrote:Well said. Pure should be in the name or something other than Spider, since that is an alert keyword for antivirus. For example, you would not want it to be called BotBasic! :lol:
Naming is a tough task as PureScript and PureJS are already taken.
Well that's at least two of us who feel that way. :wink:

Assuming that a product name change for PureBasic in not in the immediate future,
then not only should Pure be in the name of this new product,
but if possible the name should do a good job in helping to define the product.

After a moderate bout of ruminating I conjured the descriptor "Browser Application Language" to describe the function of the new product.

The total product including the language compiler, debugger, IDE, examples, and documentation could be considered the BAL Luxury Suite.

It follows then, that this new product should be called PureBALLS. :D
Keep it BASIC.
Post Reply