Best picture of a mantis, ever?!?
-
techjunkie
- Addict

- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:40 am
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Best picture of a mantis, ever?!?
One of the best photo shots I've seen... incredible!! Looks like CGI...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/showmeeuph ... otostream/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/showmeeuph ... otostream/

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
- Kaeru Gaman
- Addict

- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:57 pm
- Location: Germany
- Joakim Christiansen
- Addict

- Posts: 2452
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
Re: Best picture of a mantis, ever?!?
What's so good about a photo of a blurry house?



I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
This isn't a mantis

it's an alien

it's an alien
PureBasic 5.73 | SpiderBasic 2.30 | Windows 10 Pro (x64) | Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

- Joakim Christiansen
- Addict

- Posts: 2452
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
- Joakim Christiansen
- Addict

- Posts: 2452
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
-
techjunkie
- Addict

- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:40 am
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Best picture of a mantis, ever?!?
> One of the best photo shots I've seen
Personally, I think it's a fake. Look at the ground: there's a definite strip
under the insect's body that is sharper in focus than anywhere else. Why?
That's very suspicious if it's meant to be an unretouched photograph. The
camera shouldn't have such differences in focus like that. Fake, I say.

Personally, I think it's a fake. Look at the ground: there's a definite strip
under the insect's body that is sharper in focus than anywhere else. Why?
That's very suspicious if it's meant to be an unretouched photograph. The
camera shouldn't have such differences in focus like that. Fake, I say.

I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
I am also wondering of the shadows. Perhaps i am wrong here, but if you look at the direction of the shadows, you can think of where the sun should be. If you compare the shadows from the front legs with the leftmost leg, they are barely visible.
The house in the background looks like CG.
About the focus, pb, using my mirror reflex with a macro lens / other kind of close-up lens (or if you go further away & zoom i guess) you do get such a sharp focus. It would actually look pretty much like that if you got so close. AFAIK
The house in the background looks like CG.
About the focus, pb, using my mirror reflex with a macro lens / other kind of close-up lens (or if you go further away & zoom i guess) you do get such a sharp focus. It would actually look pretty much like that if you got so close. AFAIK


