PureBasic Forums - English

I understand your concern, but the fact is PB use a lot of common name for its commandset. You can check the list here http://www.purebasic.com/documentation/reference/commandindex.html and you will see a lot, we won't prefix them all as it will make main code less readable
That's why it's hurting ...

Why Fred? Every PB-Function collides with module-function-names ...
so how should we call our event-procedures now?

Imagin a custom window-module for screens ... you want to have
an "event"-procedure. The logical step is to call it "Event()" and use
Window::Event() to call the function out of the ...

There was a feature request that comtois has granted by using
submeshes for the cube. The problem is, that ogre needs the
same performance for a submeshes like a normal mesh.
CreateCube() should have a parameter to decide, if it should
be one mesh or 6 submeshes.

MFG PMV

There are a few problems with this:
1. the work done by PB-Team has to be done again
2. you will problably not be able to use a pb-screen (OpenScreen()) and so drawing and 2d commands couldn't be used
3. the task size is aproxamatly endless as OGRE3D is really huge
4. later, the created code has to ...

If i remember right, GrabSprite() has never worked with InitEngine3D().
Use the solution above with rendertextures and you should get your screenshot.

MFG PMV

The question is not the need ... the problem is the size and time that is needed to get everything working. OGRE3D would fit PureBasic perfectly, if ... the PB-Team gets OGRE3D up to date to the 2.1 Version. But i don't know if OGRE3D 2.1 is already ready to be implmented into PB ... it could be ...

Dropping OGRE support to create there own 3D engine based on OpenGL?
Sorry but i had to laugh there. :lol:
Do you have checked out what OGRE really can? Do you have compared it
with what PB OGRE can? OGRE 3D is very hugh and is still evolving.
The problem is not that it is laking somewhere. Our ...

Shouldn't be loops always aligned to 32/64 bit?
I don't have done much with ASM so this is more a question
... arent instructions always 32/64-bit aligned?

As long as you are only using your own functions, you can create your
own "system" that will provide a functionality to do cleanup on exit. But
this will always create a dependancy on this custom solution. On bigger
projects, or when you have multiple projects, every project will have this ...

Really nice text Bo Marchais, thanks for the hint :wink:

I dont have usefull stuff to say like that. I just try to have fun.
Every finished milestone makes me smile. Progress makes me
smile. So even when i have to do stuff that doesn't make fun,
i think about the finished work and that makes me ...

I remember some note from PB docs
- The declaration of arrays, lists or map with Dim, NewList or NewMap must always be done inside the procedure AttachProcess.

Don't know why it has to be done this way (can someone explain?), in my DLLs I ignored this (also even not declaring all those ...

Maybe the middle mouse button will work for you

Maybe a thread with function-requests of OGRE like the thread for
missing windows-api structures would be interessting?

That way, not only the PB-Team would have a easier way to see
what function are missing, but the community, too.
Just my 2 cents.

MFG PMV

In calculations, PB will use the variable type that matches the used variables.
That means if you have a division of just intenger, the result will be an integer.

If you need to convert on the fly from integer to float, as the calculation based
on only integer variables needs to be done in ...

Nested modules would only make a difference for me, if the scope of the
inner modules is only inside the parent module, where they are defined.
Thats where i see nested modules necessary.

A module can only accessed by modules, that are defined in the same
parent module. Child modules will not ...