Space time - simulation
Space time - simulation
Hello,
here is a simulation of space time. Specifically over two ("fixed" ?) black holes.
Space time - Alessandro Roussel
Other video (other author, melody sheep) :
What happens in a short period of 250 milliseconds in the Universe.
here is a simulation of space time. Specifically over two ("fixed" ?) black holes.
Space time - Alessandro Roussel
Other video (other author, melody sheep) :
What happens in a short period of 250 milliseconds in the Universe.
Re: Space time - simulation
-> What the authors of the 2nd video forgot to tell : every 250ms, 15000 stars disappear, because they go away, quicker than the light. These are artist...
Re: Space time - simulation
This should make you fall asleep
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztVV54sPOns
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztVV54sPOns
Re: Space time - simulation
absolutely beautiful coding
Re: Space time - simulation
Thanks for sharing @Olli & idle
Re: Space time - simulation
Ow ! Happy to read you ! Note that, for the 1st video, Alessandro Roussel is the "coder".
I do not know, if it has used a software, or, if it has coded his video. Anyway, his bases are the physic and the maths, sure.
And, for my personal idea, I want to code anything about massive objects (black holes and neutrons stars). Since any years, I have several ideas, I want to share. And it is not very complex. I won't use 3D, but just 2D to stay simple, for me, and for you, who will test such a code.
Just the time is missing to install rightly a computer, but the coding time will come back for me !
Re: Space time - simulation
Is that parallax shit? (Hugs from Italy)Olli wrote: Fri Nov 10, 2023 9:29 pm I want to code anything about massive objects (black holes and neutrons stars). Since any years, I have several ideas, I want to share. And it is not very complex. I won't use 3D, but just 2D to stay simple, for me, and for you, who will test such a code.
Re: Space time - simulation
You should communicate about who consent, or not, consent, to vulgar humour.
First, because, any coders will make good, very good iso parallaxes in good games.
Second, because the whole Universe is falling, in a hole so great, that this hole is everywhere over the Universe.
The scale is so big, that the space and time measurements are all away :
- before the "big bang"
- far away over the Universe.
So big, that, we won't never have real datas of our future.
So big, that, we won't never get even one evidence of the future of this fall, its parameters, its speed, far quicker than the light.
Also, to share physical ideas, and hypothesis, sometimes, it is better to stay simple. Your eyes have never seen other than 2D. The screens are 2D. So, when you bypass any 3D artistic concepts, as it was simple parallaxes, sure, no need to waste energy to persist in 3D to share an idea where all the Universe is being eaten by a big monster as black as the light seems to be fixed !
First, because, any coders will make good, very good iso parallaxes in good games.
Second, because the whole Universe is falling, in a hole so great, that this hole is everywhere over the Universe.
The scale is so big, that the space and time measurements are all away :
- before the "big bang"
- far away over the Universe.
So big, that, we won't never have real datas of our future.
So big, that, we won't never get even one evidence of the future of this fall, its parameters, its speed, far quicker than the light.
Also, to share physical ideas, and hypothesis, sometimes, it is better to stay simple. Your eyes have never seen other than 2D. The screens are 2D. So, when you bypass any 3D artistic concepts, as it was simple parallaxes, sure, no need to waste energy to persist in 3D to share an idea where all the Universe is being eaten by a big monster as black as the light seems to be fixed !
Re: Space time - simulation
If I was intelligent like you, Olli, I wouldn't get "offended" by any shit I read on the internet, especially when it comes from a friendly, mad, silly Italian like me
Re: Space time - simulation
Any particular reason you are resorting to personal attacks?Piero wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 11:18 pm If I was intelligent like you, Olli, I wouldn't get "offended" by any shit I read on the internet, especially when it comes from a friendly, mad, silly Italian like me
![]()
Best wishes to the PB community. Thank you for the memories. 
Re: Space time - simulation
WHAT?
Are you serious?
Re: Space time - simulation
*scratches head*
Re: Space time - simulation
When two dark holes are colliding, some energy appears from this collision.
If I go deeper, these two dark holes loose some energy, and then some energy appears.
If this energy is matter, the resulting dark holes takes again this energy, which falls to this resulting dark hole.
Only the energy, which passes over the gravity can escape.
Even the light does not pass over the gravity (the gravity of a massive object, as a dark hole).
I observe that the "neutrinos" pass over the gravity. I am not sure, but it seems that the neutrinos pass over the gravity.
(
And if it is the right rule : if the neutrinos are not subject of the space-time distorked by the several massive objects, then this will give an evidence of the root of the expansion of the Universe : local root or external root.
This evidence will appear to Earth, as a neutrinos flow which will come from a far object to the Earth, before a rays flow, from this same far object.
)
My hypothesis is, in a very free space where two dark holes are colliding, and they produces a flow of neutrinos.
This flow is graduated, from few units to a very massive wave containing lots of energy through these neutrinos.
A density strong enough for that, if one of these neutrinos declares itself to a matter particle, the neutrinos flow, which will pass this first particle, will grow very up its matter declaring statistic.
And on front of this first particle, billions and billions of particles will declare themselves to all types of matter (as anti-matter particles) from these neutrinos.
I think that, if a neutrino is a normal cyclist, and if a particle of matter, or a particle of anti-matter, is a cyclist who fell off his bike, then this collective fall of the racing team is the big- bang. Very long after the collision of the two black holes. Also very far from this collision. But not far enough to be outside the event horizon. And, in any case, outside the event horizon, there is not enough space-time distortion for the fallen cyclist to cause another cyclist to fall.
If I go deeper, these two dark holes loose some energy, and then some energy appears.
If this energy is matter, the resulting dark holes takes again this energy, which falls to this resulting dark hole.
Only the energy, which passes over the gravity can escape.
Even the light does not pass over the gravity (the gravity of a massive object, as a dark hole).
I observe that the "neutrinos" pass over the gravity. I am not sure, but it seems that the neutrinos pass over the gravity.
(
And if it is the right rule : if the neutrinos are not subject of the space-time distorked by the several massive objects, then this will give an evidence of the root of the expansion of the Universe : local root or external root.
This evidence will appear to Earth, as a neutrinos flow which will come from a far object to the Earth, before a rays flow, from this same far object.
)
My hypothesis is, in a very free space where two dark holes are colliding, and they produces a flow of neutrinos.
This flow is graduated, from few units to a very massive wave containing lots of energy through these neutrinos.
A density strong enough for that, if one of these neutrinos declares itself to a matter particle, the neutrinos flow, which will pass this first particle, will grow very up its matter declaring statistic.
And on front of this first particle, billions and billions of particles will declare themselves to all types of matter (as anti-matter particles) from these neutrinos.
I think that, if a neutrino is a normal cyclist, and if a particle of matter, or a particle of anti-matter, is a cyclist who fell off his bike, then this collective fall of the racing team is the big- bang. Very long after the collision of the two black holes. Also very far from this collision. But not far enough to be outside the event horizon. And, in any case, outside the event horizon, there is not enough space-time distortion for the fallen cyclist to cause another cyclist to fall.

