
I'm wondering when was the last time anyone, ie a PB developer, went through the coding examples and brought them up-to-date with the latest release and/or the 64-bit version. It's very frustrating when an example fails because of 'old' code.

Lewis
The same might be asked about the FAQ on these forums: http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... =13&t=4876Lewis wrote:I'm wondering when was the last time anyone, ie a PB developer, went through the coding examples and brought them up-to-date....
I think Lewis was talking about the examples that are included in PB help,DK_PETER wrote:I hereby nominate you two to do the cleaning: there are 404996 posts to examine and update.
Such sophistry is not useful.DK_PETER wrote:......I hereby nominate you two to do the cleaning: there are 404996 posts to examine and update......
Dear BorisTheOld, Danilo, Lewis a.s.f...BorisTheOld wrote:Such sophistry is not useful.DK_PETER wrote:......I hereby nominate you two to do the cleaning: there are 404996 posts to examine and update......
A locked FAQ, intended as a first point of reference for PB neophytes, is part of the product documentation and might reasonably be expected to contain current and accurate information.