Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
Num3
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2812
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
Location: Portugal, Lisbon
Contact:

Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by Num3 »

Costs around 100 Dollars...

It's a China made iPad clone, running on Android...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q599sQ41 ... r_embedded

You gotta admit, they are getting better and faster in making clones :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

I personally have a sciphone I68++ (aka iphone clone) and i'm happy with it...

Of course it's not perfect and has some flaws, but i got exactly what i was buying for 50 bucks.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
Last edited by Num3 on Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
SFSxOI
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2970
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:24 pm
Location: Where ya would never look.....

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by SFSxOI »

I think its a real iPed physically, they just put Android on it.
Last edited by SFSxOI on Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The advantage of a 64 bit operating system over a 32 bit operating system comes down to only being twice the headache.
Num3
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2812
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
Location: Portugal, Lisbon
Contact:

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by Num3 »

I don't think it's an iPad.

It's a clone... The hardware components have to be cheaper and less robust... For 100 bucks, don't expect the same quality.

Has i said above i can't complain about my iPhone clone, it works and has not failed me yet!

Hmmm... Come to think about it, iPed has some advantages over iPad...

Costs less... And it runs flash !!! :lol:
User avatar
GWarner
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 605
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:34 pm
Location: USA

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by GWarner »

And I'll bet if they use the cell phone network you won't be restricted just one carrier. Or they chose to use Wi-Fi and avoid the issue entirely.
User avatar
yoxola
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 4:23 pm

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by yoxola »

I have a chinese "Hackintosh", well it actually works BETTER than original Mac.

As Apple only use "closed hardware structure" and sells over 5x price as the real price the components cost, can't see a reason why it can't be done cheaper.

>It's a clone... The hardware components have to be cheaper and less robust... For 100 bucks, don't expect the same quality.

Must admit there're nearly no proper support or future expansion on the product itself but the hardware isn't bad due to the hardware is damn cheap in China.

Overall, unable to be any competitor, but is nice for personal use.
This field was left intentionally as signature.
User avatar
the.weavster
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 6:53 pm
Location: England

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by the.weavster »

Num3 wrote:Costs around 100 Dollars...

It's a China made iPad clone, running on Android...
Cool. Personally I think it would be more useful with Ubuntu/Hildon but I guess Android is more hip and trendy.
jamba
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:03 pm
Location: Triad, NC
Contact:

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by jamba »

any idea where to buy one of these?

I see lots of Apad and Archos type android tablets, but I have not seen this one for sale

what kind of hardware is in this iPed? the APad's tend to have slower cpu's and such than the real iPad (but have other goodies like usb ports, etc)
-Jon

Fedora user
But I work with Win7
Num3
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2812
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
Location: Portugal, Lisbon
Contact:

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by Num3 »

jamba wrote:any idea where to buy one of these?

I see lots of Apad and Archos type android tablets, but I have not seen this one for sale

what kind of hardware is in this iPed? the APad's tend to have slower cpu's and such than the real iPad (but have other goodies like usb ports, etc)
Google is your friend :mrgreen:

http://www.apad.tv/
User avatar
the.weavster
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 6:53 pm
Location: England

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by the.weavster »

Little John
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by Little John »

I'll wait until the release of an iPet. :lol:
Num3
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2812
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
Location: Portugal, Lisbon
Contact:

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by Num3 »

Little John wrote:I'll wait until the release of an iPet. :lol:
Shhhhh... That's apple's next big thing!!!
SFSxOI
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2970
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:24 pm
Location: Where ya would never look.....

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by SFSxOI »

I wonder if they got a license from Apple to steal their IP technology? A lawsuit, or other legal action, could force an injunction or order which would prevent the clone (if thats what it really is) from being allowed for import to countries to which such an injunction or order applies. This would make posession of the clone illegal in those countries after the injunction/order goes into effect. Apple did it to PsyStar, a MAC Clone producer (filed for bankruptcy I think due to the Apple lawsuit against them in 2009).

I wonder also if this is the same Apple chineese manufacturer partner that treated its employees so badly in terms of basic human rights violations that several of them comitted died (by suicide)?
The advantage of a 64 bit operating system over a 32 bit operating system comes down to only being twice the headache.
User avatar
GWarner
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 605
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:34 pm
Location: USA

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by GWarner »

Last night I saw a news bite about Steve Jobs showing off the new "iPhone 4" and that his demonstration got derailed because the wireless network had all the users it could handle and wouldn't accept any more users until the nuber of active users went down. I thought it was hilariously funny.

But durring that same news bite they said that Android was now ahead of Apple in market share of smart phone OSes. They showed that Android had a 24% market share while Apple had only 21%.

I think the iPads, iPhones, and iPod Touches (only because it's an iPhone without the phone) will eventually suffer the same fate as the Macintosh. It makes a big initial splash, rides the "wave" for a few years, then slowly sinks to a minimal market share because consumers realize their choice are being limited by Apple. They want the ability to make their own choices so they reject Apple and its imposed choice limitation, and switch to something else that gives them back their ability to choose.
Last edited by GWarner on Wed Jun 09, 2010 1:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
the.weavster
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 6:53 pm
Location: England

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by the.weavster »

~ Deleted

Somehow I got a double post.
Last edited by the.weavster on Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
the.weavster
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 6:53 pm
Location: England

Re: Oh! Look! It's an iPed!

Post by the.weavster »

SFSxOI wrote:I wonder if they got a license from Apple to steal their IP technology? A lawsuit, or other legal action, could force an injunction or order which would prevent the clone (if thats what it really is) from being allowed for import to countries to which such an injunction or order applies.
Devices like these have been available in China for quite a long while, it looks like they have just altered the appearance of some to make them look more like the iPad, I doubt they've got any Apple DNA in them. Search YouTube for 'Smart Q7' for example and see how old the reviews are.

GWarner wrote:But during that same news bite they said that Android was now ahead of Apple in market share of mobile device OSes. They showed that Android had a 24% market share while Apple had only 21%.
That's 24% and 21% of 'smart-phones' not 'mobile devices', Apples market share of 'mobile devices' is around 2.7%.

Also, the smart-phone statistics should be taken with a very large pinch of salt as there is no industry standard definition of what constitutes a smart-phone. Most statistics regarding smart-phones found on the Internet originate from either Gartners or IDC, these have both come up with their own criteria for what makes a smart-phone (and btw they are different from each other), these criteria serve to exclude many of the most powerful and popular handsets from major companies like Samsung and LG (some have suggested possibly by design) making Apple and RIM seem much bigger players than they really are. If Samsung and LG were so minded they could give their handsets a few minor tweaks to fit the criteria and you would very quickly see the RIM/Apple market share figure plummet (by that I don't mean because their sales were going down but because they would be smaller fish in a bigger pond). Some of the criteria are not about the functions available but how those functions are implemented - if it runs locally on the device it's smart, if it uses the network it's not even if the latter is actually more logical and more efficient.

I think you're probably right about how Apples place in the market will eventually shake down.
Last edited by the.weavster on Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply