ToolBar Element Limit (IMA) ?

Working on new editor enhancements?
User avatar
Flype
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1542
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: In a long distant galaxy

ToolBar Element Limit (IMA) ?

Post by Flype »

Hi freak,

Not a drama,

But it seems that the IDE has a limit of 51 elements in the toolbar.

Maybe it's enough but i'm making a rich toolbar like this (famfamicons) :

Image

If i add a 52th element in preferences->toolbar dialog
Or if i manually modify purebasic.prefs, then the IDE crash :

An error has been detected in the IDE
Error: Invalid access memory
Last edited by Flype on Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
No programming language is perfect. There is not even a single best language.
There are only languages well suited or perhaps poorly suited for particular purposes. Herbert Mayer
User avatar
Flype
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1542
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: In a long distant galaxy

Post by Flype »

Hi Freak,

This bug (IMA) is still present in the 4.40 beta.
No programming language is perfect. There is not even a single best language.
There are only languages well suited or perhaps poorly suited for particular purposes. Herbert Mayer
freak
PureBasic Team
PureBasic Team
Posts: 5941
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:21 pm
Location: Germany

Post by freak »

Yes, 50 is the limit. I could raise it, but seriously, how many toolbarbuttons do you need ?
quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur
User avatar
Flype
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1542
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: In a long distant galaxy

Post by Flype »

Lol, I just needed a 51th element...
It's was a pure hazard to see this bug.

You're right, the <50> limit is quite enough, especially because the IDE only supports ONE toolbar.

The only problem is the <IMA>, a limit messagebox would be cleaner.


By the way,
Thank you for the brand new theme feature in the IDE, i really like it.
No programming language is perfect. There is not even a single best language.
There are only languages well suited or perhaps poorly suited for particular purposes. Herbert Mayer
Post Reply