INTEL Mac support! When?
-
- New User
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:06 pm
- Location: Germany
INTEL Mac support! When?
Any ETA on that? PureBasic is simply unusable for me without Intel Mac support...
That's good news.
Can you please consider to allow more than 9 procedure parameters to be fully compatible with the Windows version. I sometimes need this.
If not possible, please limit Windows version as well, to be compatible and consider this limit while development on Windows. Thanks.
Regards
CSAUER
Can you please consider to allow more than 9 procedure parameters to be fully compatible with the Windows version. I sometimes need this.
If not possible, please limit Windows version as well, to be compatible and consider this limit while development on Windows. Thanks.
Regards
CSAUER
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PB4.1 - Win: MacBook black 2008 2,4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, MacOSX 10.5/VMWare/WinXP
PB4.1 - Mac: MacMini G4 1,4 GHz, 512 MB RAM, MacOSX 10.4
PB4.1 - Win: MacBook black 2008 2,4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, MacOSX 10.5/VMWare/WinXP
PB4.1 - Mac: MacMini G4 1,4 GHz, 512 MB RAM, MacOSX 10.4
Please consider that Carbon will run out of service in the future (carbon will not support 64 bit technologies, maybe they drop carbon within next OS X releases). Next Photoshop version will not be 64 bit on Mac, because of this. Can you please consider to switch to COCOA framework to be prepared for the future of OS X? Thanks.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PB4.1 - Win: MacBook black 2008 2,4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, MacOSX 10.5/VMWare/WinXP
PB4.1 - Mac: MacMini G4 1,4 GHz, 512 MB RAM, MacOSX 10.4
PB4.1 - Win: MacBook black 2008 2,4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, MacOSX 10.5/VMWare/WinXP
PB4.1 - Mac: MacMini G4 1,4 GHz, 512 MB RAM, MacOSX 10.4
I also have to use more than 10 parameters on Windows and would not appreciate this supped limitation.CSAUER wrote:That's good news.
Can you please consider to allow more than 9 procedure parameters to be fully compatible with the Windows version. I sometimes need this.
If not possible, please limit Windows version as well, to be compatible and consider this limit while development on Windows. Thanks.
Regards
CSAUER
For your problem, can you pass a structure pointer instead?