INTEL Mac support! When?

Mac OSX specific forum
SquareIris
New User
New User
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:06 pm
Location: Germany

INTEL Mac support! When?

Post by SquareIris »

Any ETA on that? PureBasic is simply unusable for me without Intel Mac support...
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 18162
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

It is in progress, but we get no date for now ("When it's done").
CSAUER
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:23 am
Location: Germany

Post by CSAUER »

That's good news.

Can you please consider to allow more than 9 procedure parameters to be fully compatible with the Windows version. I sometimes need this.

If not possible, please limit Windows version as well, to be compatible and consider this limit while development on Windows. Thanks.

Regards
CSAUER
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PB4.1 - Win: MacBook black 2008 2,4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, MacOSX 10.5/VMWare/WinXP
PB4.1 - Mac: MacMini G4 1,4 GHz, 512 MB RAM, MacOSX 10.4
CSAUER
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:23 am
Location: Germany

Post by CSAUER »

Please consider that Carbon will run out of service in the future (carbon will not support 64 bit technologies, maybe they drop carbon within next OS X releases). Next Photoshop version will not be 64 bit on Mac, because of this. Can you please consider to switch to COCOA framework to be prepared for the future of OS X? Thanks.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PB4.1 - Win: MacBook black 2008 2,4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, MacOSX 10.5/VMWare/WinXP
PB4.1 - Mac: MacMini G4 1,4 GHz, 512 MB RAM, MacOSX 10.4
User avatar
oryaaaaa
Addict
Addict
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Okazaki, JAPAN

Post by oryaaaaa »

Since the personal computer is now used focusing on intel mac, if it can use, I would sometimes like to try many things.
Mistrel
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:04 pm

Post by Mistrel »

CSAUER wrote:That's good news.

Can you please consider to allow more than 9 procedure parameters to be fully compatible with the Windows version. I sometimes need this.

If not possible, please limit Windows version as well, to be compatible and consider this limit while development on Windows. Thanks.

Regards
CSAUER
I also have to use more than 10 parameters on Windows and would not appreciate this supped limitation.

For your problem, can you pass a structure pointer instead?
Post Reply