PBDev Developer v1.04 is out for PB 4.10

Edwin Knoppert · Post by **Edwin Knoppert** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:01 am

Update notice for licensed users:

PBDev is now prepared to work with PB compiler v4.10

Note that PBDev can no longer use the older compiler versions.

Edwin Knoppert · Post by **Edwin Knoppert** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 5:19 pm

Note that i have added support for console applications as well.
The older PBDev supported dll's and exe's.

mskuma · Post by **mskuma** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:46 pm

Hi Edwin, given there's no trial and you have to buy the tool to trial it (and nothing indicated about refund if deemed unsuitable) is a weakness of this tool and approach, though I understand the reason (after finding the answer in your FAQ - i.e. piracy concern).

milan1612 · Post by **milan1612** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:59 pm

mskuma wrote:Hi Edwin, given there's no trial and you have to buy the tool to trial it (and nothing indicated about refund if deemed unsuitable) is a weakness of this tool and approach, though I understand the reason (after finding the answer in your FAQ - i.e. piracy concern).

I don't even consider to buy software which I can't test :roll:

SFSxOI · Post by **SFSxOI** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:08 am

yep, me neither. If I had not been able to try out PureBasic first I would have never bought it. I'm the same way with software, can't take it for a "test drive" then I don't buy it.

Tipperton · Post by **Tipperton** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:54 pm

milan1612 wrote:I don't even consider to buy software which I can't test :roll:

I had that very same problem with PBDev when I first got PureBasic, but after an extended e-mail conversation with Edwin (in which I think he got a little annoyed with me) I plunged in and bought it.

Turned out to be money well spent!

Edwin Knoppert · Post by **Edwin Knoppert** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:58 pm

>in which I think he got a little annoyed with me

Haha, i don't recall though..

>Turned out to be money well spent!
Thank you