Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2002 6:04 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Franco.
I STILL WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE POSSIBILITY TO
CREATE PUREBASIC LIBS WITH PUREBASIC ITSELF.
Fred, can you consider it while adapting/rewriting the compiler for fasm
Have a nice day...
Franco
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2002 8:25 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by fred.
When franco want something...
. It's still not planned anyway I could take a look to it.
Fred - AlphaSND
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2002 8:30 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Franco.
Fred, thanks for taking a look to it.
It's truly appreciated.
Have a nice day...
Franco
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 1:52 am
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by blueb.
Thanks Fred,
Just knowing that you will look into it makes us feel warm all over!
Merry Xmas,
--blueb
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:42 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Berikco.
Originally posted by blueb
Just knowing that you will look into it makes us feel warm all over!
Yep, and i can use some extra heat overhere.....cold outside
It would be cool to write libs in PB, good idea
Regards,
Berikco
http://www.benny.zeb.be/purebasic.htm
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:13 am
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by PB.
> I STILL WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE POSSIBILITY TO
> CREATE PUREBASIC LIBS WITH PUREBASIC ITSELF.
This has been discussed MANY times before, with the general consensus
being that such libs would not be as fast/compact as pure ASM libs.
I, for one, wouldn't want to use libs written in PureBasic, so if
this ever happens, then PLEASE, Fred, force the lib to have a prefix
on its name such as PB (or something) to clearly identify it as
not being written from ASM code. Thanks!
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2002 4:26 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by MrVainSCL.
Hi PB!
i agree with you for the identify! Sure, it would be nice to create some nice own libs for easy use of big program code i.e. - but as you sayed and discused on this forum long time before - those libs are surely not as fast/compact as pure asm and what if you want to write your own lib and using any existing PB basic command of any other lib??? The result will be a small code snip as own lib with some or many included purebasic libs in the own with PB created lib?? ;(
Maybe Fred will find an efficent way to create small and fast PB created libs!? However Fred, a identify for such libs would be really nice!
PIII450, 256MB Ram, 80GB HD + 6,4 GB, RivaTNT, DirectX8.1, SB AWE64, Win2000 + all Updates...
greetz
MrVainSCL! aka Thorsten