I STILL WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE POSSIBILITY TO
CREATE PUREBASIC LIBS WITH PUREBASIC ITSELF.
Fred, can you consider it while adapting/rewriting the compiler for fasm
Have a nice day...
Franco
I still would like to have...
-
BackupUser
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
-
BackupUser
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
-
BackupUser
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
-
BackupUser
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
-
BackupUser
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Berikco.
It would be cool to write libs in PB, good idea
Regards,
Berikco
http://www.benny.zeb.be/purebasic.htm
Yep, and i can use some extra heat overhere.....cold outsideOriginally posted by blueb
Just knowing that you will look into it makes us feel warm all over!
It would be cool to write libs in PB, good idea
Regards,
Berikco
http://www.benny.zeb.be/purebasic.htm
-
BackupUser
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by PB.
> I STILL WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE POSSIBILITY TO
> CREATE PUREBASIC LIBS WITH PUREBASIC ITSELF.
This has been discussed MANY times before, with the general consensus
being that such libs would not be as fast/compact as pure ASM libs.
I, for one, wouldn't want to use libs written in PureBasic, so if
this ever happens, then PLEASE, Fred, force the lib to have a prefix
on its name such as PB (or something) to clearly identify it as
not being written from ASM code. Thanks!
> I STILL WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE POSSIBILITY TO
> CREATE PUREBASIC LIBS WITH PUREBASIC ITSELF.
This has been discussed MANY times before, with the general consensus
being that such libs would not be as fast/compact as pure ASM libs.
I, for one, wouldn't want to use libs written in PureBasic, so if
this ever happens, then PLEASE, Fred, force the lib to have a prefix
on its name such as PB (or something) to clearly identify it as
not being written from ASM code. Thanks!
-
BackupUser
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by MrVainSCL.
Hi PB!
i agree with you for the identify! Sure, it would be nice to create some nice own libs for easy use of big program code i.e. - but as you sayed and discused on this forum long time before - those libs are surely not as fast/compact as pure asm and what if you want to write your own lib and using any existing PB basic command of any other lib??? The result will be a small code snip as own lib with some or many included purebasic libs in the own with PB created lib?? ;(
Maybe Fred will find an efficent way to create small and fast PB created libs!? However Fred, a identify for such libs would be really nice!
PIII450, 256MB Ram, 80GB HD + 6,4 GB, RivaTNT, DirectX8.1, SB AWE64, Win2000 + all Updates...
greetz
MrVainSCL! aka Thorsten
Hi PB!
i agree with you for the identify! Sure, it would be nice to create some nice own libs for easy use of big program code i.e. - but as you sayed and discused on this forum long time before - those libs are surely not as fast/compact as pure asm and what if you want to write your own lib and using any existing PB basic command of any other lib??? The result will be a small code snip as own lib with some or many included purebasic libs in the own with PB created lib?? ;(
Maybe Fred will find an efficent way to create small and fast PB created libs!? However Fred, a identify for such libs would be really nice!
PIII450, 256MB Ram, 80GB HD + 6,4 GB, RivaTNT, DirectX8.1, SB AWE64, Win2000 + all Updates...
greetz
MrVainSCL! aka Thorsten