Page 1 of 6
@admin: delete the newest forum member
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 2:34 am
by fsw
please delete the newest forum member "wariniraq"
the webpage linked to the member links to a unapropriate site
thanks
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 3:57 am
by freak
Looks like a bot. done.
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:33 am
by Dreglor
what about datingservices2? he doesn't look like a vaild member either although his url doesn't connect
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:27 am
by netmaestro
SexyRussianGirl doesn't look legit, and sexyrussiangirI appears to be a joke. Recommend removal of both.
[edit] Actually, several of the last few signups appear not to be legitimate. Is somebody targeting us?
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:07 am
by Num3
Yes, i checked the list for the last entries... Most are bogus, with links to porn or gambling sites.
I would advice setting up those type these letters in the image here things...
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:04 am
by Berikco
Num3 wrote:Yes, i checked the list for the last entries... Most are bogus, with links to porn or gambling sites.
I would advice setting up those type these letters in the image here things...
This letters in the image thing is enabled...but still a lot of bogus users added it seems.
I guess they have a lot of time...?
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:27 am
by GeoTrail
Maybe you should add a image verification code to the forum for signing up and logging in. I saw a phpBB mod somewhere.
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
by Bonne_den_kule
GeoTrail wrote:Maybe you should add a image verification code to the forum for signing up and logging in. I saw a phpBB mod somewhere.
NO!!!!
The wand in Opera will not work then. It's enough with image vertification on registration only.
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:57 pm
by Psychophanta
Berikco wrote:Num3 wrote:Yes, i checked the list for the last entries... Most are bogus, with links to porn or gambling sites.
I would advice setting up those type these letters in the image here things...
This letters in the image thing is enabled...but still a lot of bogus users added it seems.
I guess they have a lot of time...?
I'd say the opposit: they have no time, their time ended.
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:12 pm
by GeoTrail
Bonne_den_kule wrote:GeoTrail wrote:Maybe you should add a image verification code to the forum for signing up and logging in. I saw a phpBB mod somewhere.
NO!!!!
The wand in Opera will not work then. It's enough with image vertification on registration only.
Well, that's simple, use a real browser
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 5:22 pm
by Trond
And Firefox reads the image?
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:38 pm
by GeoTrail
No, but it does render it so I can read it hehehehe
Couldn't avoid the previous post since I know you love your Opera hehehehe. No hard feelings, neighbour hehehe
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:49 pm
by Bonne_den_kule
Firefox can't do anything without those crappy extensions
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:50 pm
by GeoTrail
Sure it can. It's a webbrowser, and it is used to browse the internet
Which it does perfectly. There's a difference between a webbrowser and a browser suite, which some call bloat
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:27 pm
by Trond
GeoTrail wrote:Sure it can. It's a webbrowser, and it is used to browse the internet
Which it does perfectly. There's a difference between a webbrowser and a browser suite, which some call bloat
Opera with this topic,
this url, osnews.com and the transfers tab opened uses less memory than Firefox with only one empty tab opened. Now tell me who's bloated.
Which it does perfectly.
Not on Windows 2000. It crashes on startup.