@admin: delete the newest forum member

fsw · Post by **fsw** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 2:34 am

please delete the newest forum member "wariniraq"
the webpage linked to the member links to a unapropriate site
thanks

Post by **freak** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 3:57 am

Looks like a bot. done.

Dreglor · Post by **Dreglor** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:33 am

what about datingservices2? he doesn't look like a vaild member either although his url doesn't connect

netmaestro · Post by **netmaestro** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:27 am

SexyRussianGirl doesn't look legit, and sexyrussiangirI appears to be a joke. Recommend removal of both.

[edit] Actually, several of the last few signups appear not to be legitimate. Is somebody targeting us?

Num3 · Post by **Num3** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:07 am

Yes, i checked the list for the last entries... Most are bogus, with links to porn or gambling sites.

I would advice setting up those type these letters in the image here things...

Post by **Berikco** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:04 am

Num3 wrote:Yes, i checked the list for the last entries... Most are bogus, with links to porn or gambling sites.

I would advice setting up those type these letters in the image here things...

This letters in the image thing is enabled...but still a lot of bogus users added it seems.
I guess they have a lot of time...?

GeoTrail · Post by **GeoTrail** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:27 am

Maybe you should add a image verification code to the forum for signing up and logging in. I saw a phpBB mod somewhere.

Bonne_den_kule · Post by **Bonne_den_kule** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm

GeoTrail wrote:Maybe you should add a image verification code to the forum for signing up and logging in. I saw a phpBB mod somewhere.

NO!!!!
The wand in Opera will not work then. It's enough with image vertification on registration only.

Psychophanta · Post by **Psychophanta** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:57 pm

Berikco wrote:
Num3 wrote:Yes, i checked the list for the last entries... Most are bogus, with links to porn or gambling sites.

I would advice setting up those type these letters in the image here things...
This letters in the image thing is enabled...but still a lot of bogus users added it seems.
I guess they have a lot of time...?

I'd say the opposit: they have no time, their time ended.

GeoTrail · Post by **GeoTrail** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:12 pm

Bonne_den_kule wrote:
GeoTrail wrote:Maybe you should add a image verification code to the forum for signing up and logging in. I saw a phpBB mod somewhere.
NO!!!!
The wand in Opera will not work then. It's enough with image vertification on registration only.

Well, that's simple, use a real browser

Trond · Post by **Trond** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 5:22 pm

And Firefox reads the image?

GeoTrail · Post by **GeoTrail** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:38 pm

No, but it does render it so I can read it hehehehe

Couldn't avoid the previous post since I know you love your Opera hehehehe. No hard feelings, neighbour hehehe

Bonne_den_kule · Post by **Bonne_den_kule** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:49 pm

Firefox can't do anything without those crappy extensions

GeoTrail · Post by **GeoTrail** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:50 pm

Sure it can. It's a webbrowser, and it is used to browse the internet

Which it does perfectly. There's a difference between a webbrowser and a browser suite, which some call bloat

Trond · Post by **Trond** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:27 pm

GeoTrail wrote:Sure it can. It's a webbrowser, and it is used to browse the internet Which it does perfectly. There's a difference between a webbrowser and a browser suite, which some call bloat

Opera with this topic, this url, osnews.com and the transfers tab opened uses less memory than Firefox with only one empty tab opened. Now tell me who's bloated.

Which it does perfectly.

Not on Windows 2000. It crashes on startup.