List of Demands

Got an idea for enhancing PureBasic? New command(s) you'd like to see?
kake26
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 7:21 pm
Contact:

List of Demands

Post by kake26 »

I like PureBasic alot but it has short commings that anoy me a bit so I'm gonna post it here and see what happens.

1. Needs a the capability to fork as well as thread.
2. Needs to be able to read socket input line by line.
3. The ability to make librarys under *nix.
4. Stream support would be nice, think filestreams,memory streams, and string streams/lists. I'm reffering to Delphi/FPC TStream stuff.
5. OOP support, the ability to create classes that can inherit and have protected and public procedures. That would be majorly cool if this got added .
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6166
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:

Post by blueznl »

demands = requests i presume?

anyway... if you paid attention to the boards you may have noticed that...

- pb is not oo and perhaps never will
- you can do streams using winapi

dunno about the others

but if you wanna see what happens, well, not much unless one asks nicely...
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
kake26
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 7:21 pm
Contact:

Post by kake26 »

demands = requests is correct. I'm just tossing it out there and hoping something comes of it since thats really all anyone can do.
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

That's what I was thinking... demands won't achieve anything.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Dare2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3321
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:55 am
Location: Great Southern Land

Post by Dare2 »

Heya kake26.

Having a good year end? :)
@}--`--,-- A rose by any other name ..
kake26
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 7:21 pm
Contact:

Post by kake26 »

Not really you can blame #5 for that no OOP.
koehler
User
User
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 7:46 am

Post by koehler »

kake26 wrote:Not really you can blame #5 for that no OOP.
But for many of us, #5 not being there is considered a plus.
You may want to look at another language, as it appears Fred is not going to go down the OOP path.

Object-Oriented Programming with Visual Basic .NET
by J. P. Hamilton (October, 2002 - List Price: $34.95)
ISBN: 0596001460
Post Reply