
http://os4.hyperion-entertainment.biz/

+1 . In fact, if an OS was designed to work only with AMD64 (ie: full 64 bits native API) it could have a chance, as it would remove a lot of porting problem and maintenance issues for different package version (you can see here for Windows: 32 bits, 32 bits Unicode, 64 bits Unicode - 3 package for the same software). At first glance i tough than OS X for PC would be this, but it seems like not. Would be have a good way to limit hacking for them too.Num3 wrote:And i do miss the RAM Disk, it's more usefull than you can imagine![]()

SOooooooooooooo, I suspect if enough of us actually said "Hey how about a AMD64 or x86 version?", then perhaps they would do something about it?Hardware flexibility: AmigaOS4.0 targets the PowerPC family of processors. It runs on the full PowerPC range, from the low-end 4xx series appropriate for information appliances and cell phones, up to the 9xx series appropriate for high-end server and processing applications. A highly portable codebase and Hardware Abstraction Layer makes porting AmigaOS to other devices using the PowerPC architecture, from SOC components to the STI Cell processor, a simple and speedy matter. The PowerPC family is one of the most popular CPU architectures, and whatever your application there will be a solution for you. However the clean AmigaOS codebase was written with portability in mind, so if you've got your heart set on another processor family, talk to us and we'll see what we can do.