PowerPC support

Linux specific forum
Palpatine
User
User
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:43 am
Location: Rotterdam
Contact:

PowerPC support

Post by Palpatine »

Hi,

I was just wondering if PB Linux only runs on x86 distributions or also on PPC ones?

Best regards,
Ron
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6166
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:

Post by blueznl »

no, fred, noooooooooooooo....

:roll:

:twisted:
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
naw
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:57 pm

Post by naw »

Why not...

I think porting PB to PPC Linux (perhaps even AIX) would be very easy for Fred, because ...

... he's already done it! (at least I *think* so)

Fred has ported PB to MAC OSX and is using GTK as an interim measure until he implements OSX's native GUI - so that means he's already done all the PPC ASM stuff and is already using the Linux GUI APIs (GTK). So, like I said he's surely already done it.

I think it would be a great idea. I hear the XBOXII will be PPC based as well. Fred then has a language that is available for the biggest 64W Servers to a pokey little W2K Server....
Ta - N
FloHimself
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 3:38 pm
Location: Lüneburg - Germany

Post by FloHimself »

OT:
naw wrote:I think it would be a great idea. I hear the XBOXII will be PPC based as well. Fred then has a language that is available for the biggest 64W Servers to a pokey little W2K Server....
XBox II are based on IBM PPC and ATI graphic chip!? MS going the Nintendo way to keep the cost low?
naw
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:57 pm

Post by naw »

Its what I heard in conversation... Its surprising cos M$ would have a lot of redevelopment to do and backwards compatability probs with XBOX1.

Maybe its B/S - I'll check...
Ta - N
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6166
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:

Post by blueznl »

i've heard the rumours too, it may include x86 compatibility on microcode level, and why not?
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
FloHimself
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 3:38 pm
Location: Lüneburg - Germany

Post by FloHimself »

no doubt about the rumours! just wondering that ms stop working with intel / nvidia and go with ibm / ati!
naw
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:57 pm

Post by naw »

IBM make better faster / cheaper / CPUs than Intel. IBMs new Unix Servers scale up to 64 Ways are dual core and allow virtualisation in the CPU.
IBMs 64W Server is over 3 times faster than Suns 104W and is twice as fast as HPs Itanium based 64W

The PPC chips are mass produced into all sorts of consumer stuff you'd never imagine (maybe even toasters ;-) )
Ta - N
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

maybe even toasters
could be cool to program my washing machine with purebasic :D
Dare2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3321
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:55 am
Location: Great Southern Land

Post by Dare2 »

thefool wrote:could be cool to program my washing machine with purebasic :D
hehe. Some important functionality:

Code: Select all

If isEvenNumber( sockCount )
  hideSock()
EndIf
SetAllWhitesToAverageColour()
While SomeOneInShower()
  HogHotWater()
  Delay(15000)
  HogColdWater()
  Delay(15000)
Wend
If WarrantyVoid()
  GroanAndGrumble()
  SplashAndSplatter()
  TangleAndTear()
  EmitSmell()
EndIf
@}--`--,-- A rose by any other name ..
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

hehe :D
Post Reply