Page 6 of 8

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:44 pm
by thefool
Molebox is too simple to crack/patch. No real protection

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:19 pm
by r_hyde
thefool wrote:In fact i am more concerned of source code theifery than cracking/keygenning
Well, that's a good point which I had not considered. Again, I don't have the burden of worrying about this sort of thing in my job so it's not much on my mind. If source code is really all that easy to extract from .NET assemblies then that is indeed troublesome.

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:00 pm
by Tipperton
r_hyde wrote:If source code is really all that easy to extract from .NET assemblies then that is indeed troublesome.
True, and probably a good reason to avoid .NET until you can find a way to make it a lot harder to do...

I'm concerned about both code theft and cracking/key genning, but if I had to choose one of them, code theft would definitely it. There are things you can do about cracks and key gens, but if someone gets your code, all bets are off....

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:24 am
by electrochrisso
If I was to write very secure software I would steer clear of dot net.
There was a young lad (boy) the other day that cracked into a new 80 million dollar network in twenty minutes. I would not mind betting it were run using the dot net framework.

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 10:08 am
by Sebe
Website? Source?

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 11:07 pm
by electrochrisso
It was on the TV news here in Australia. I will have to look for it and get back to you.
Nearly all large companies use dot net over here.
Microsoft rules the roost in Australia.

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 11:42 pm
by Sebe
But it's you who think it was .Nets fault. I don't think so. There may be some zero day exploits but every software with networking features has such exploits. I think you're blaiming .Net because you don't like it :wink:

And if performance is a problem, then google for ngen...

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:43 am
by thefool
Sebe wrote:But it's you who think it was .Nets fault. I don't think so. There may be some zero day exploits but every software with networking features has such exploits. I think you're blaiming .Net because you don't like it
I have to agree on this one.

Re: Percent of PCs with .NET framework installed?

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:10 pm
by freepurebasic
uninstall .net framework from cpanel/uninstall programs/uninstall windows components ... and your cpu will get a fresh air...


tested on win xp sp2 (2002) =the best ever and now system in the world,win xp sp3 ,win 7

Code: Select all

openconsole():printn("vista is a mistake.a wrong conception like win 2000,winme")

Re: Percent of PCs with .NET framework installed?

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:40 pm
by Rook Zimbabwe
yes... killing .net is good! Microssoft announced that they wouldn't be supporting it... then apparently retrated that and in the alleged Microsoft APPS store it will be supported for 8.

I just upgraded my T41 laptop to 7 (32 bit) and it runs 9000% faster than Vista did on that thing... I am going to see if .net is on that as well! I don't have any software that requires it... not playing sacred or TitanQuest sso don't need it. :mrgreen:

Re: Percent of PCs with .NET framework installed?

Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:27 am
by Mistrel
Rook Zimbabwe wrote:yes... killing .net is good! Microssoft announced that they wouldn't be supporting it...
Do you have an article that reports this? I'm very curious.

Re: Percent of PCs with .NET framework installed?

Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:54 am
by Thorium
Rook Zimbabwe wrote:I don't have any software that requires it... not playing sacred or TitanQuest sso don't need it. :mrgreen:
Sacred does not need the .NET framework.
All it needs is DirectX7 and a video codec (dont remember which one).

Re: Percent of PCs with .NET framework installed?

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:27 am
by freepurebasic
Mistrel : ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha



i have experimented myself then i check taskmgr.exe and cpu speed ...

here is 0% without any program open in win xp sp2
or 1% without any program open on win7 and sometimes 0%


how much is showing your processor on the task manager Mistrel?


make sure you don't install:

an antivirus
an anti spyware
a kind of shield


make sure that billy's stuff is off:

special desktop effects
firewall off
update off



under services.msc :

make sure security center service is DISABLED
firewall: DISABLED
custom care program shit Disabled
update shit Disabled
update time shit disabled
windows defender shit DISABLED

and do not install .net shit !!!!!!!!!

Re:

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:29 pm
by naw
milan1612 wrote:Yes, but how many users actually use Vista? :wink:
Stats from my web site show:
* windows 81%:
- Win XP 47.02%
- Vista 28.7%
- Win7 22.96%
- Win200x 1.12%
* Macintosh 12.07%
* iPhone 2.52%
* Linux 0.90%
* Android 0.72%

Re: Percent of PCs with .NET framework installed?

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:58 pm
by c4s
@naw
Well, 3 years ago it probably was a little different. ;)