PureBasic Forums - English

Posted: **Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:04 pm**

Psychophanta wrote:That's Right. so, What happens with the admins?

If they continue spamming, it must mean someone is buying!

Note: A joke.

Posted: **Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:26 pm**

PB wrote:> In Opera you can remove anything BUT iframes, but you can remove
> the content of them.

Removing iframes is superior because by blocking the frame you don't
need to block all its individual items inside.

Well, you don't need to block the individual items inside, you can block the url the iframe contains to block it all at once. And I just found out that you _can_ block iframes in Opera, but it's per site.

Posted: **Sun Aug 20, 2006 1:41 pm**

See we have another one: ArtLebedeff

+ Sexystar!

Posted: **Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:01 pm**

srod wrote:See we have another one: ArtLebedeff

+ Sexystar!

I would allow sex stuff.
But not economy related stuff.

These people merge both. Thus, lets crush them.

Posted: **Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:19 pm**

And now slitherz2040 with ringtones and the like!

Some people huh!

Posted: **Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:35 pm**

+ Barbarius!

Wonder if it's the same tw*t all the time?

Posted: **Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:56 pm**

It's probably some disgruntled former member or something like that. At the college where my wife works they never got any spam on their work email accounts until a student flunked out and left with a really bad attitude. Within a week all the admin staff found themselves signed up to receive emails from porn sites and spammers. Now they're getting 60+ emails each every day from these places.

Posted: **Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:06 pm**

I must have seriously annoyed lots of people then, judging by the amount of spam I receive every day!

Mind you, most of it is for viagra... uhm, wonder if that's my ex-girlfriend's doing?

Posted: **Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:28 am**

srod wrote:Mind you, most of it is for viagra... uhm, wonder if that's my ex-girlfriend's doing?

Posted: **Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:24 pm**

No problem, with the fake members, i check this from time to time, and delete almost all members that have zero posts and a website.

It's a little better with the visual confirmation, wich is switched on for about a year now, but i still have to remove a dozen fake users every month.

Posted: **Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:12 am**

There are 749 members with 0 post

Why not delete all members with 0 post that are older than 1 year

This forum would loose 521 members, but who cares...

Also one of the newest members Mr_RED has 0 posts and a website regarding PureBasic in romanian.
Is he working for you guys

Posted: **Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:59 am**

Not everyone who doesn't post and has a website is a bot, is he?

Posted: **Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:54 am**

fsw wrote:There are 749 members with 0 post

Why not delete all members with 0 post that are older than 1 year

Nooooo
Do that mean you would kill every person who never say nothing?
There are people who wants to belong the forum and at the moment has nothing to say, or simply wants to only watch, learn, listen.

Posted: **Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:59 am**

The simplest way to stop this, is no url site option in profiles...

They just do this so they get high hit rate on search engines.

If a user want's to post is website, he can make it on is signature.

Posted: **Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:36 am**

> There are people who wants to belong the forum and at the moment has
> nothing to say, or simply wants to only watch, learn, listen.

True. It should be like free web-based mail though: if a member doesn't
log in for a year, their membership should be deleted. In my opinion.

PureBasic Forums - English

@admin: delete the newest forum member