utopiomania wrote:
Well, my advice is that decisions should be based on cold, hard facts, not fiction.
Wow??
You are NOT getting it.
WATCH the videos and tell me the fiction in the physics experiments?
Explain to me why so many hundreds of architects have joined together, at some risk to their careers mind you, to seek a science-based explanation?
utopiomania wrote:One thing that disturbs me about your post is that I think it is about denial. The fact that muslim terrorists did this to you is too hurtful, so you dream up other explanations?
Again, the 9/11 issue we are discussing is not who but how?
Muslims are but a new foe in a long list of haters.
The Oklahoma City bombing was not by Muslims, yet many believed it to be early on.
Strangely, much of that building was obliterated, yet still stood when the dust cleared.
Unlike the 2 Towers and Bldg 7 which was never directly hit, yet all 3 came down in perfect demolition?
utopiomania wrote:'Independent' investigations as you call it often isn't independent at all, especially if published on YouTube.
And what is wrong with YouTube? Does it modify the content provided by its users?
I think you are confusing it with WikiPedia?
