Page 3 of 3

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:46 pm
by RichardL
Not kidding at all… here is the story.

Robert had to carry out a project for the industrial experience year of his degree and I suggested that he made a system to compare similar objects and detect differences, showing the results on a TV picture. The solution was based on various modules that had been developed over the years and then he added some extra bits and the control software. Here is how it worked:

Point a monochrome camera at the object
Extract the line rate from the video signal.
Create an orthogonal sampling clock using a phase locked loop.
Digitise the video and write it into RAM… this become the reference image.
Continue to sample the output of the camera, displaying it on the RGB inputs to a standard RGB TV monitor, but limit the video range to about 80%
On a pixel by pixel basis compare the digital data still coming from the digitiser with the reference held in RAM
When the difference exceeds a chosen level top up the red channel to 100%... thus anything that moves gets identified, twice. Why?

In tests he found that pointing the camera at a clock showed a red edge on the minute hands after only a few seconds. This allowed him to check that the clock was working!

Happy days…

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:29 pm
by utopiomania
How off-topic can you get? Dell_jockey tried to tell you about the new UFO he's building, and
the answers here answers his question off topic, not on topic, so I guess it's ok, after all.
Get it ?? :)

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:42 pm
by dell_jockey
Yes, it's ok, and look at the fun we had with this thread! :lol: I just downed a glas of Laphroaig and am laughing my a** off.

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 3:35 am
by Joakim Christiansen
fsw once said to me:
"The forum is only a location to change information, not a playground."