Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:31 pm
by Fred
Yes i plan to encapsulte some class in interfaces, wait and see..
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:50 pm
by Straker
Fred wrote:Yes i plan to encapsulte some class in interfaces, wait and see..
Cool. That's an OOP statement if I ever heard one.
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:04 pm
by Kale
Fred wrote:Yes i plan to encapsulte some class in interfaces, wait and see..
NICE ONE!!!

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:23 pm
by fsw
Fred wrote:Yes i plan to encapsulte some class in interfaces, wait and see..

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:27 pm
by Fred
on the OGRE side, i hope i'm not misunderstood. The plan is: patch OGRE to be COM compatiable and deliver some interfaces in PB to act directly on the objects.
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:36 pm
by Kale
Fred wrote:on the OGRE side, i hope i'm not misunderstood. The plan is: patch OGRE to be COM compatiable and deliver some interfaces in PB to act directly on the objects.
Yep, thats what i thought!

As long as we get more of the OGRE API exposed (through interfaces or not) i can't wait.

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:41 pm
by josku_x
Reading everything through, I'll call my friend to ask him why he doesn't want to try out PB3.94.... I guess the answer is:
"U nutZ?!?!?! I'd n3v3r uze PB3.9x, coz it doesn't have doubleZ! n hamburger w/ duble cheez iz mus hav! Alzo, I laik quadZ. Tink boutit!"

I wouldn't understand anything,