Browsers are one of those things that people get passionate about.
A long time ago Netscape ruled, dominated. It had some none-standard stuff that made a few tricks possible, these were called "extra features". They were called "neat, nice, nifty".
Then MS IE caught up. It dominated. It introduced some non-standard stuff that made a few tricks possible. These were called "dirty tricks". They were called "evil, nasty, bad".
Back when NS ruled, some webmasters made their websites NS-Only. They even displayed messages saying this, and were rude to people who arrived with IE browsers. This was considered cool.
Now IE rules. Some websites use IE only features that make visiting with anything else a pain. This is considered arrogant.
Go figure.
IE does have some iffy stuff, esp ActiveX. But FF and Moz are not bulletproof. Sheet-heads mostly target IE. And MS/IE make better news than FF. Moz.
Anyhow, nearly ALL modern browsers are nice and work well.
By the slightest of margins, and at the moment, I prefer mozilla over firefox and firefox over IE.
A little while ago I preferred FireFox.
Tomorrow ..?
Arrogance is as arrogance does. Is a moderator/administrator changing someone else's poll just "because they can" arrogance?@}--`--,-- A rose by any other name ..
