morph demo

gilles_k · Post by **gilles_k** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 8:02 am

I like it.

48 fps 100000 dots any resolution.
390 fps 10000 dots any resolution.
750 fps 1000 dots any resolution.
And just for the fun 5 fps 1000000 dots any resolution.

Specs : P4 3.06 HT + GeForce 6800 Ultra.

Thomas · Post by **Thomas** » Tue Oct 19, 2004 5:41 pm

griz wrote:
The graphics card is not so important because the program does not use 3D functions.
I was getting about 26 fps with an Athlon XP 2400 ... only 1 fps slower than your XP 3000. I wonder if graphics card performance does play more of a role? Clearing the screen and painting pixels may be plain faster on some graphics cards. I've got a Radeon 9700 non pro in this machine, what kind of a graphics card are you using? In the (latest) final version of your program (posted above) I get 41 fps.

I'm getting 44 fps with a Radeon 9800 non pro.

Kale · Post by **Kale** » Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:18 pm

61 fps 100000 dots any resolution. See sig for cpu, etc...

sk8terboi · Post by **sk8terboi** » Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:37 am

I think it is very awesome! Great job! How long did it take you to make??? I imagine a long time!

NoahPhense · Post by **NoahPhense** » Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:43 am

That's sweet..

good job

- np

blueznl · Post by **blueznl** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:59 am

14 fps (not very good is it?) and a very annoying flickering titlebar on 3.93 latest updated libs

NoahPhense · Post by **NoahPhense** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:15 am

blueznl wrote:14 fps (not very good is it?) and a very annoying flickering titlebar on 3.93 latest updated libs

True. But I figured someone would have fixed that.

blueznl · Post by **blueznl** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:01 pm

turned out to be 16 fps, had something running in the background, a rather disappointing score for an amd64-3000, i think this motherboard asus k8n-e deluxe sux...

Derek · Post by **Derek** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:33 pm

I'm getting 41 fps with an AMD643000 on an asus K8V motherboard. Got an old Nvidia Ti4600 graphics board and 1 gig of pc333 memory.

blueznl · Post by **blueznl** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 7:10 pm

ooops, left debugger on, it's 38 fps here

Jimbo_H · Post by **Jimbo_H** » Sat Jun 11, 2005 12:00 am

griz wrote:
The graphics card is not so important because the program does not use 3D functions.
I was getting about 26 fps with an Athlon XP 2400 ... only 1 fps slower than your XP 3000. I wonder if graphics card performance does play more of a role? Clearing the screen and painting pixels may be plain faster on some graphics cards. I've got a Radeon 9700 non pro in this machine, what kind of a graphics card are you using? In the (latest) final version of your program (posted above) I get 41 fps.

I get 41 fps on my pooter (spec in my sig) with the "final" version with 500Mb RAM already used by my open programs. Will try with a compiled version and nothing open later to see if it's any quicker

Amazing demo by the way, beautifully done and shows off PB very well

Jim

PureBasic Forums - English

morph demo

Awesome