How safe are your PureBasic sources with Internet Explorer?

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
Dare2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3321
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:55 am
Location: Great Southern Land

Post by Dare2 »

Heya Thefool,

So would it be true to say you are a FireFox supporter?

lol. :D


I've tried IE, Opera, K-Meleon, FireFox, Mozilla for extended periods each, and NS briefly. Ran with FireFox for ages, liked it, thought it was the best.

But since installing XP I find it sluggish, and it crashes from time to time. It has even hung my comp a few times. Everything except k-Meleon outperformed it. (k-Meleon is also sluggish and crashworthy).

So now I am using Mozilla (still safer than IE) and fastest on my setup.

In one of your posts you said something about setting FireFox up properly. What exactly needs to be done to set it up properly?

Thanks.
@}--`--,-- A rose by any other name ..
User avatar
aszid
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 8:38 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Post by aszid »

http://www.tweakguides.com/Firefox_1.html

this has almost all of the tweaks... (yes, i actually DID set up firefox right, and it's still slower than IE on my system)
--Aszid--

Making crazy people sane, starting tomorrow.
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

> CERTAIN pages do load faster in IE

Okay, so name a few so I can see this for myself... :)
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

> Firefox has its flaws like crashing while trying to view PDF files

This is just BULLSHIT -- it doesn't crash when I view PDFs. Just because
someone has a crappy/corrupted system doesn't mean we all do!

> and taking a lot of time to load

Compared to IE, yes -- because IE is PART OF THE OPERATING SYSTEM
and thus always partly in memory! If IE was to load from scratch every
time it was loaded, then it too would be slower to start!
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

>> Based on this, Firefox SHOULD be more hacked than IE, but it isn't
>
> ?? FF is not more popular than IE !!

I think I lost concentration out of frustration when I made that comment.

> The day that FF becomes the most used, there will be a lot of holes
> founded and exploits

Even if that's true, the updates to Firefox have been faster than anything
Microsoft have done for IE. So any fixes get done in a matter of days,
compared to months. This can be seen for yourself if you look at the
past fixes compared to IE's past fixes.

Also, there simply isn't much to exploit compared to IE. Most of IE's stuff
are ActiveX exploits, which, as I've pointed out, Firefox doesn't have. You
can't exploit something that doesn't exist. ;)

> [Firefox is] the Flinstone's browser???

No. Firefox has lots of features via extensions... you only install the stuff
you want. Firefox does more for me than IE currently does. :)
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Num3
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2812
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
Location: Portugal, Lisbon
Contact:

Post by Num3 »

IE ????

What's that ????

Was it an icon on desktop that i erased !?!?!?
Doobrey
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 4:47 am
Location: Dullsville..population: me
Contact:

Post by Doobrey »

aszid wrote: in relatively recent times there have been tons of security updates for OSX, at the same time as apples market share has been growing. This means one of 2 things

a- Apple started making crappier software recently
b- people have been targeting osx more as it has become more popular


now... as far as apple fans say, osx is the most secure OS that apple has ever made... that leaves option b.
What about the idea of plugging security holes just because they're there?

Or would you prefer Apple to do it the MS way, only release a fix once there are exploits out in the wild?

Anyway, I'm a happy Firefox user on Windows and the only thing I have a problem with is WindowsUpdate which wants to run ActiveX.
The last time I ran WindowsUpdate, it complained my security settings were too high and told me to reduce them :evil:
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

Dare2 wrote:Heya Thefool,
So would it be true to say you are a FireFox supporter?
yes :D and im proud of it!
seriously. I belive in all PB's posts, and i belive that your system does have a fault somewhere. i run 4 machines [2 windows pc's, 1 linux pc & one laptop], the linux and 1 of the pc's are mine and the rest is my familys. i just installed firefox on them, removed the IE icon now they use it without complaining :D same with openoffice! i just have to help a bit now and then but it works!

but there is something wrong with your install. firefox crashed 1 time here, but thats nothing compared to internet explorer..

utopimania wrote:
I'm on a 1Mb/s (2Mb/s soon) line. and I do browse a lot, and ..haven't tried Firefox yet, you're
right about that.
good, you havent tried firefox :D so you cant tell that internet explorer is faster. i would recommend you to download it. you are on 1mbit and if you want to use 5 minutes [download AND installation AND learning to use] of your live that will save you billions of seconds in waiting time and system restarts, try it :)
Dare2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3321
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:55 am
Location: Great Southern Land

Post by Dare2 »

@aszid

Thanks for that link!


thefool wrote:
Dare2 wrote:Heya Thefool,
So would it be true to say you are a FireFox supporter?
yes :D and im proud of it!
:D
thefool wrote:... but there is something wrong with your install. firefox crashed 1 time here, but thats nothing compared to internet explorer..
Okay, will reinstall again, using tips from aszid's link and see if it goes okay. Loved FF until recently. Then was sad ...
thefool wrote:same with openoffice
Yeah, I also use open office! 8)
@}--`--,-- A rose by any other name ..
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

the new 2.0 [allthough beta] looks very promising! its damn pretty hehe looks a bit like office some says, but i think it looks even prettier. :)
Kale
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 3000
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:03 pm
Location: Lincoln, UK
Contact:

Post by Kale »

Firefox Rocks! Period! Anyone who says any different is a big poo poo head! :P
--Kale

Image
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 18350
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

:lol:
User avatar
Joakim Christiansen
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2452
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Post by Joakim Christiansen »

All the browsers are great, we have all different needs.

I read about a test between IE and FF in some magazine, it said IE was more secure. (but it still use FF, I like the interface)
I like logic, hence I dislike humans but love computers.
traumatic
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by traumatic »

Microsoft Monthly Magazine? ;)
Good programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, should be hard to read.
Dare2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3321
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:55 am
Location: Great Southern Land

Post by Dare2 »

LOL.
@}--`--,-- A rose by any other name ..
Post Reply