just a minor observation 16x <> 16x

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6172
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:

just a minor observation 16x <> 16x

Post by blueznl »

hmmm... nothing important, but i just noticed something...

i was burning on my laptop as well as on my normal machine at the same time, and i noticed that me regular 24 speed liteon burner, set up to burn at 16x, is about 1.5x as fast as the philips 40x speed burner, also set up to burn at 16x

makes you wonder about all those speed claims...
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB - upgrade incoming...)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
dracflamloc
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1648
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:52 pm
Contact:

Post by dracflamloc »

Those Xx readings on cd drives have always been lame. First off they are an approximation. Secondly, the highest speed is usually a speed that the cd drive will only hit for a few seconds at most, while usually it stays much slower. It also depends on the cd/media you use too. But yea thats pretty annoying.
Dreglor
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 759
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 11:22 pm
Location: OR, USA

Post by Dreglor »

I always wonder why they choose the Xx style speed why can't they say XMB/s ?
~Dreglor
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6172
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:

Post by blueznl »

marketing power i guess...
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB - upgrade incoming...)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

> I always wonder why they choose the Xx style speed why can't they say XMB/s ?

CD-ROMs originally spun at 150k bytes/second (1x) -- thus MB/sec was never
a consideration as such speeds were never possible. As CD-ROMs got faster,
the powers that be decided to just base the new speeds as a multiple of this,
so a 2x speed drive could transfer data at 300k bytes/second, and so on.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Trond
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 7446
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:45 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Trond »

Dreglor wrote:I always wonder why they choose the Xx style speed why can't they say XMB/s ?
1x is the speed a cd player reads an audio cd with to play the audio in real time.
User avatar
Rescator
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1769
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 5:05 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Rescator »

Not sure if 1x is truly the audio cd data speed, for all we know it may also be the rotation speed of the audio cd.

However, as always the speed is under perfect conditions.
(tested and rated by the manufactorer)
So it's not uncommon to see 16x burning
turn out to be 15.9x actual speed, etc.
These days the only use the XXx speec rating has
is general guidelines for burning speeds,
and ability to ensure that proper media is used at the proper burn and read speed rating, etc.
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6172
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:

Post by blueznl »

indication, yes, but 50% off is a bit much :-)
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB - upgrade incoming...)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
Post Reply