Don't forget the VB program size of over 5MB for an empty program ... have to include the runtime libraries to befare ... or .NET for over 30 MB for a blank program, hehe ...
Seriously, size doesnt matter .. or thats what some women say .. hrmm, sure ...
Anyway, The only thing I see RB have over PB is crossplatform capability (including the ability to crossplatform compile on the same OS!), and it's all-in-one IDE. It is slower then PB, and create fricken huge EXEs)
Second, thank heavens I bought PB and not RB - and I nearly went the other way.
This has cemented my belief in PB and in the people on this board. I have run tons of examples now, from the RB server and from some RB user sites. Lots of bloat, and things like screen flicker, etc, are quite bad on my system. PB and PB coders are good.
Having said that, I am still glad to have it. I agree with Kale. Better to have and not want.
Sincerely, after the PB existence, RB and VB are an almost absolute shame at least on matter of final executeables sizes and speed, and package size, installation ... (I think this last one is the reason used by those who cash to "justify" prices, hahah )
Well, nice RB has a free version.
Best tool for the job, guys. Don't waste any time being a zealot for this language or that. Just use what works best for the task in front of you. No single language or platform is "the best".
RB is pretty nice, I've seen some rather large applications written using it (mostly for Mac).
Remember that the free version is only for legal VB owners, though I see they made no attempt to verify the downloaders own VB.
hmmm, it would seem that this tool isn't good for much of anything but 10 yr olds trying to learn, and even then I think that learning without a GUI designer is the best way...