What should be in the next version!

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.

What should be in the next version

More Varible Types (Unsigned, Doubles)
29
22%
More Varible Types (Unsigned, Doubles)
29
22%
Update to Orge Engine
9
7%
Update to Orge Engine
9
7%
Upgrading to DirectX9 (err?)
4
3%
Upgrading to DirectX9 (err?)
4
3%
Updates to Old Tools (visual designer?)
7
5%
Updates to Old Tools (visual designer?)
7
5%
Bug Fixes
9
7%
Bug Fixes
9
7%
Optimize For More Speed
4
3%
Optimize For More Speed
4
3%
Other
5
4%
Other
5
4%
 
Total votes: 134

Bonne_den_kule
Addict
Addict
Posts: 841
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 7:10 pm

Post by Bonne_den_kule »

a RAD IDE/objectoriented visual designer
Last edited by Bonne_den_kule on Thu Dec 30, 2004 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

> MACROS!

These are confirmed for v4.0 (as Fred said in a previous post).

I'd like to see uncalled procedures NOT being compiled into the executable.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Shannara
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 11:19 pm
Location: Emerald Cove, Unformed

Post by Shannara »

Optional parameters support for procedures. The weird thing is, these are already supported for the native PB libraries but not for any user created libraries and procedures ... .. :D
traumatic
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by traumatic »

Shannara wrote:The weird thing is, these are already supported for the native PB libraries but not for any user created libraries and procedures ... .. :D
This is only true for procedures.
Libraries do support optional parameters since v3.50 (IIRC)
Good programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, should be hard to read.
User avatar
Paul
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 1282
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:34 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by Paul »

Yup... and even El_Choni's tailbite app allows for this feature. ;)
Image Image
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6166
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:

Post by blueznl »

doubles doubles doubles.... oh... that's a triple? :-)
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6166
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:

Post by blueznl »

oh, and of course FIXED LENGTH STRINGS

please please please please...
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
Shannara
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 11:19 pm
Location: Emerald Cove, Unformed

Post by Shannara »

traumatic wrote:
Shannara wrote:The weird thing is, these are already supported for the native PB libraries but not for any user created libraries and procedures ... .. :D
This is only true for procedures.
Libraries do support optional parameters since v3.50 (IIRC)
Take a look at all of the pb native libraries that come with PB. There is the optional [Flags] parameters ... optional, they have been there for quite awhile :)


I didnt know about Tailbite supporting optional parameters, I'm now going to have to grab the newest release and read the docs :D
Dreglor
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 759
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 11:22 pm
Location: OR, USA

Post by Dreglor »

I look at the orge engine as a big bug becasue alot of it is buggy and out of date and thats the only part that hasn't been updated for a long time.
the only thing it really good for now is for 3d demos...
~Dreglor
Wolf
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: S.T

Post by Wolf »

1. More complete Network library.

2. Update Visual Designer and better IDE ( isn't good we use other IDE and designer for work with PB )

3. Fixed length strings.
newbie
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 296
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 5:47 pm
Location: FRANCE
Contact:

Post by newbie »

I have voted "more variable types", thinking to fixed lenght strings.
- Registered PB user -

Using PB 4.00
bluejoke
User
User
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Guenzburg, Bavaria, Germany
Contact:

Post by bluejoke »

more complete Network library & bugfixes
User avatar
geoff
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 12:01 am
Location: Cornwall UK
Contact:

Post by geoff »

Doubles, of course
LikePB
New User
New User
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 10:14 pm

Post by LikePB »

Big and nice feature i think is support Unicode in PB.

Very users like use unicode strings and apps in PB but is always hard to work for this they must use another programming language :(

Other nice feature is fix lenght strings and maybe fix problem in KillThread() when use it.
Post Reply