With Notpad 2004, you can copy,move,delete and rename the document, Quick open the documents you want, save your selection to a file, UpperCase, LowerCase and ProperCase a Word, among other things.
Notpad is just lovely, but Notepad is faster. It is rather a Wordpad replacement, than a notepad replacement. Something beetween: it is faster than wordpad (and more advance), but slower than notepad.
EditPad Lite is free and far more versitle than any MS NotePad application. http://www.editpadlite.com/
Look for the "Free EditPad Lite" link on that page for the free version. Used it here for years and love it. Has all the creature feature I want and need in a "plain text editor".
What is NotePad 2004 anyway? Is this something you wrote or should this NotePad 2004 post be in the off topic forum as a MS side topic?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Randy
I *never* claimed to be a programmer.
Nothing is faster, more stable, or easier to maintain than code that doesn’t exist.
I agree with you that are in the market many other editors, notepads and wordpads that are must better that mine.
it´s true but you have missed the point, which is share knowledge with comunity board.
I know that somewhere inside my code, someone will use some part just to put in their programs.
So, the point is sharing things, that´s why we are a "comunity".
cabaptista wrote:Randy,
...notepads and wordpads that are must better that mine.
...it´s true but you have missed the point...
You are corect on the second count. There was little explaination so I guess I mistook the name "NotePad" to be an optional MS release.
As for others being better, maybe others have more features. I didn't download it yet because I'm too lazy to open my firewall but I'm sure yours is superior if for no other reason, because it is shared source code. I try to make useful contributions. Sometimes I just show my ignorance instead
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Randy
I *never* claimed to be a programmer.
Nothing is faster, more stable, or easier to maintain than code that doesn’t exist.
Good work but you really should leave the name of coders intact within any third party written includes (.pbi) you use, such as NicTheQuick's string handling routines include, I noticed they've been deleted. Just for politeness sake.