utterly jaw dropping 1024 bytes

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
Post Reply
User avatar
fsw
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1603
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 9:18 pm
Location: North by Northwest

utterly jaw dropping 1024 bytes

Post by fsw »

in another thread traumatic wrote: ...why is everything "utterly jaw dropping" these days? ;)
Because you can still find "utterly jaw dropping" stuff out there.

Like this 1024 bytes OpenGL program:

http://perso.wanadoo.fr/franck.charlet/ ... oulder.zip
Top
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Re: utterly jaw dropping 1024 bytes

Post by PB »

> Because you can still find "utterly jaw dropping" stuff out there.
> Like this 1024 bytes OpenGL program:
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/franck.charlet/ ... oulder.zip

Hmm, this is utterly slow on my PC -- about 5 fps or so. Maybe it's jaw
dropping on higher-end PCs, but it runs pathetic on lesser systems. :(
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Top
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

it runs without any problems at all, with a lot of fps's.

I dunno my system is might classified as middle-class?
2000+ amd athlon XP, 768 mb ddr ram, radeon 9600XT 256mb, 240 gb hdd.
?

whatever, its pretty nice in 1 kb!
Top
Karbon
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 1:42 am
Location: Ashland, KY
Contact:
Contact Karbon

Post by Karbon »

I think the jaw-dropping part is that it works in 1024 bytes :-)
-Mitchell
Check out kBilling for all your billing software needs!
http://www.k-billing.com
Code Signing / Authenticode Certificates (Get rid of those Unknown Publisher warnings!)
http://codesigning.ksoftware.net
Top
LarsG
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 713
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 1:06 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:
Contact LarsG

Post by LarsG »

just for the record; your system is way over middle class, thefool... :)

AMD Athlon XP2400, 512 MB RAM, Hercules 3D Prophet 9600 256MB RAM, WinXP
PIII 800MHz, 320 MB RAM, Nvidia Riva Tnt 2 Mach 64 (32MB), WinXP + Linux
17" iMac, 1.8 GHz G5, 512 MB DDR-RAM, 80 GB HD, 64 MB Geforce FX 5200, SuperDrive, OSX
Top
User avatar
GedB
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1313
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 3:47 pm
Location: England
Contact:
Contact GedB

Post by GedB »

Rather slow here, perhaps it is dependant upon hardware accelleration.

Still, the thing could fit into a ZX81 without the RAM pack. Respect is due.
Top
dontmailme
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 10:35 am

Post by dontmailme »

GedB wrote:Still, the thing could fit into a ZX81 without the RAM pack. Respect is due.
Well, as long as you forget this:-

1. The OpenGL code wouldn't fit into a ZX81!, let alone Windoze :roll:
2. It would not look good, blocky grafix and B&W! :(

Now, if we were talking about the Oric Atmos, then I might agree :P

LOL
Paid up PB User !
Top
merendo
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 7:24 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:
Contact merendo

Post by merendo »

Runs quite smooth here. Really cool! I now use it as screensaver!
The truth is never confined to a single number - especially scientific truth!
Top
Dreglor
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 759
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 11:22 pm
Location: OR, USA

Post by Dreglor »

runs smooth on my laptop :o
and the computer :D
and both are semi slow
both are p4 2.4 with 1 gig of ram and ati radeon 9100 (it goes a diffrent name under the laptop)
~Dreglor
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic”