once again
once again
I've seen this topic talked about a few times but was wondering. Is using PureUPX and PureValid together decent? I know nothing is 100% but it would be nice to block some of those crackers (lol, as if there all from georgia... nevermind).
Also, Pauls RC4 lib, how do you go about crypting strings? I mean, do you encrypt then while compiling then during runtime decrypt them?
Another thing, why not just get the serial of a harddrive and then have the customer send this number to you in a email then you send them a registration key back that when these two numbers equal a certain figure, well you get the gist. I'm sure some one here already uses this method.
Also read changing your registration key and/or download link once a week, which isn't bad but if you're not selling buttloads, why not just email them out with a unique key each time. Does any one do this?
Well, guess that's all I'm curious about and if anyone has any tips, I'll gladly keep it in mind.
Also, Pauls RC4 lib, how do you go about crypting strings? I mean, do you encrypt then while compiling then during runtime decrypt them?
Another thing, why not just get the serial of a harddrive and then have the customer send this number to you in a email then you send them a registration key back that when these two numbers equal a certain figure, well you get the gist. I'm sure some one here already uses this method.
Also read changing your registration key and/or download link once a week, which isn't bad but if you're not selling buttloads, why not just email them out with a unique key each time. Does any one do this?
Well, guess that's all I'm curious about and if anyone has any tips, I'll gladly keep it in mind.
www.posemotion.com
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
RC4, as AES and other crypt command just store in a secure way a data. That's means than you can decrypt it only with the right password. If you could decode it easily, it would be no interest. On the other side, Base64, UUEncode, etc.. are encoder/decoder which doesn't need a password and can be reversed at willing.
Thanks for the information Fred, that clears up on how to use RC4.
www.posemotion.com
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
www.posemotion.com
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
I didn't get to much luck with it either, thanks Num3.Num3 wrote:Just crashes here...
Like many other protectors...
Only UPX seems to stable.
www.posemotion.com
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
my bet is that TELock is the best free encryptor around. free for commercial use too. http://www.softpedia.com/public/cat/5/2/5-2-6.shtml
The information about it sounds nice. I'll give it a try, thanks.thefool wrote:my bet is that TELock is the best free encryptor around. free for commercial use too. http://www.softpedia.com/public/cat/5/2/5-2-6.shtml
www.posemotion.com
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
I was thinking of another way to create shareware registration keys and had an idea using Pauls RC4.
1.) Encrypt your software with RC4. Make it available for download after purchase.
2.) Then an email is sent to the buyer with a link to download an exe that decrypts the purchased software. After decrypting the software it deletes itself. (Also, making the "decrypting.exe" available as a one time download. After downloading it, it can't be downloaded anymore. I'm sure this would take a php script.)
If the buyer has a problem with the first download, just reset it for him/her. Also changing both exe's every week. What do you guys think about that?
1.) Encrypt your software with RC4. Make it available for download after purchase.
2.) Then an email is sent to the buyer with a link to download an exe that decrypts the purchased software. After decrypting the software it deletes itself. (Also, making the "decrypting.exe" available as a one time download. After downloading it, it can't be downloaded anymore. I'm sure this would take a php script.)
If the buyer has a problem with the first download, just reset it for him/her. Also changing both exe's every week. What do you guys think about that?
www.posemotion.com
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
@j.baker:
I always like new theories of new protection methods. Nevertheless,
I could imagine some disadvantages of your method:
(1) It could be too complicated for a potential buyer of your product.
If someone sends you money he may just want to take one more
download of the final version. Such a protection could deter ppl to
buy your product
(2) What would happen if someone copies the decrypted file and the
decrypter.exe before installing
I always like new theories of new protection methods. Nevertheless,
I could imagine some disadvantages of your method:
(1) It could be too complicated for a potential buyer of your product.
If someone sends you money he may just want to take one more
download of the final version. Such a protection could deter ppl to
buy your product
(2) What would happen if someone copies the decrypted file and the
decrypter.exe before installing
regards,
benny!
-
pe0ple ar3 str4nge!!!
benny!
-
pe0ple ar3 str4nge!!!
Your points are valid, just always thinking here. Maybe if I would quit thinking so much I could get some sleep, lol.
www.posemotion.com
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
I keep gettingthefool wrote:my bet is that TELock is the best free encryptor around. free for commercial use too. http://www.softpedia.com/public/cat/5/2/5-2-6.shtml
Not enough free space in section table.
www.posemotion.com
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
I did that, nothing seems to work, thanks though.thefool wrote:read the help file, and turn some options on and off
www.posemotion.com
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.




