AES encryption algorithm PureBasic LIB available !

[Max.²]

@ Newbie

Updated it; was a stupid error in conjuction with the PB string handling.

More in a bit; dinner is done now.

[newbie]

ok it works now, had verified it with a software I have which does hash of strings

Still, a big Lib ! why is it so huge ? (for a lib)

EDIT : may be should we do another topic for SHA ? or take the old one I done in general discussion, don't know.

EDIT 2 : waiting for your "after dinner" work now... go go go

[Max.²]

Back. Yummy.

The lib is so big, because it also contains SHA2 and HMAC. Especially SHA2 is relatively big.

Not sure if I will get them going today, too. But it shouldn't be too difficult now. The generic functions work, but I want the easy access functions work too.

[newbie]

Hey dear, finally come back

Ok for the lib size.
May be later (once finished) could you split the lib into corresponding names ? (SHA1, SHA2, etc...).

but I want the easy access functions work too.

take your time, I'm for one who love easy and simple commands

[thefool]

isnt there something about that you can make a lib only include the needed procedure in an exe?

i think tailbite does that automatic..

Try make different exe's with the different encryptions and see if thats true.

[Shannara]

isnt there something about that you can make a lib only include the needed procedure in an exe?

i think tailbite does that automatic..

Try make different exe's with the different encryptions and see if thats true.

Damn, you beat me to it.

[sec]

such as , Max :
SHA-1 / SHA-256

Sec :
SHA-384 (is it the good one ?)
SHA-512

I have always liked multitasking ^^

Anyway, downloading your Lib right now

EDIT : why the SHA library is so huge (20.3Ko) against only 9Ko for AES ? I would have thought that AES would have been far bigger than a hash algorithm.

done part of me and it is small and simple .why? because it is PURE

[newbie]

Hi Sec,

it was just an example I was giving, don't know what Max is doing on his side

[thefool]

Damn, you beat me to it.

come get some!

well i just saw in another thread that you cant jugde on the filesize of the lib, because it only includes the needed procedures.

[Max.²]

don't know what Max is doing on his side

Currently I am trying to get a little bit of structure into the code snippet and library mess on my system. Then I start a new thread.

I finished updating the AES Library and need to package it; then I will split the SHA Libraries. Am not sure yet if I will continue on SHA2 next or if I add some more functions to the SHA1 one.

BTW, as thefool said, the size of a library really doesn't matter, only of the functions inside. The size of them can vary royally, depending on the optimization chosen. I personally am more for speed then for size, but maybe it is worth to compile them to 2 versions; most speed and least size.

[NoahPhense]

Ok, so whats the latest here? Which link or code is the AES256?

Anything higher, other than encrypting twice?

- np

[kinglestat]

i am mightiliy excited by this post

BUT

where do we download the library ?
and then which post effectiveley describes how to use it ?

I know it might sound or look dumb to some of you
But since none of the urls works there is nothing to go on!

cheers

KingLestat

[CherokeeStalker]

Is this still available for download anywhere ?
Please post a link if it is.
Thanks !