Office Style Menus, Toolbars Coolbars and XP style/skinnable

Developed or developing a new product in PureBasic? Tell the world about it.
fweil
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 725
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 5:56 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by fweil »

But never pay ment good !

Giving a hand to somedy neither mean salary nor reward.

Nothing to do in Annoucements !

Maybe in Off but never in Annoucements ...
My avatar is a small copy of the 4x1.8m image I created and exposed at 'Le salon international du meuble à Paris' january 2004 in Matt Sindall's 'Shades' designers exhibition. The original laminated print was designed using a 150 dpi printout.
Dare2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3321
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:55 am
Location: Great Southern Land

Re: Office Style Menus, Toolbars Coolbars and XP style/skinn

Post by Dare2 »

To answer the question, I prefer DLL if only one choice, would much prefer both DLL and Lib.

To address the debate, I see no prob with the post. It was a simple question - is it worth doing? Hardly an emotive issue. :P
gmatthews wrote:BTW: yes I said C libraries not assembler, and no, I'm neither going to rewrite or otherwise hand optimise to assembler, so don't bother me with this. Programming the Windows SDK in C & C++ has served me well over the years.
This may be construed as a bit heavy, but so what?

And read this:
gmatthews wrote:I am a commercial developer, so don't expect the FULL versions for free although I would produce a community version of the libraries.
So, do we now lose a community product and, if we so choose, the commercial option, because we reacted emotionally to the post and question?

Do we reject something because it has a price tag? Did we reject PB? Do we expect source code to PB? If we use Paul's designer, did we get it free, with source?

Anyhow, /RANT.
@}--`--,-- A rose by any other name ..
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

i agree as fweil said, that this should be in the offtopic section.

The post gmatthews came with was hard in language, but i cant say if all other developers than fred are that :)
Do we reject something because it has a price tag? Did we reject PB? Do we expect source code to PB? If we use Paul's designer, did we get it free, with source?
We dont expect source code to PB and source to Pauls designer, but i guess we expect a decent language from them, and they have shown that they are nice persons. both paul and the pb team. But still, gmatthews, show us what you've got.

btw, the "Office Style menus (Icons, shaded background, shadows) " is that for 98 too or just 2000/XP?
Num3
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2812
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
Location: Portugal, Lisbon
Contact:

Post by Num3 »

Karbon wrote:If you are a hobby programmer that might be true NP, but personally I don't bank on freeware that much. Typically, and note I did say TYPICALLY, commercial software (including utilities and libraries) are of better quality than freeware ones. When writing commercial software it is best to buy something and get a promise of support rather than use a freebie that might disappear in a month or two.
True for PC...

God i miss AMIGA .... :cry:
wcardoso
User
User
Posts: 80
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:06 pm
Location: Uruguay

Post by wcardoso »

Hey gmatthews !. I´d saw some days ago one post from you with laments because you´d paid $1.500 for a M$ compiler to discover you prefer PureBasic.
Well, do you hope we pay for your bad business ?.
Please, think like Fred does !
Thanks
:twisted:
with love from Uruguay
Shannara
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 11:19 pm
Location: Emerald Cove, Unformed

Post by Shannara »

PB libraries, DLL is sorta counter PB for me.

Are you going to post again? :D Post some screenies..
Kale
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 3000
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:03 pm
Location: Lincoln, UK
Contact:

Post by Kale »

Office Style menus (Icons, shaded background, shadows)
Proper, fully implemented Toolbars, Office style and standard.
Proper, fully implemented Coolbars, Office style and standard.
Owner Draw buttons, including regions (98 and a seperate 2000/XP version)
XP style controls (some with skinnable features) for ALL windows platforms (98/2000 and yes XP).
Sounds very good! I would probably buy (at the right price of course :) ). I would also prefer these in PB Lib format purely because i like to have one exe fully compiled and not dependant on DLLs.
--Kale

Image
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6166
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:

Post by blueznl »

it *really* must be the weather, why is everyone flaming everybody else? people, cool down! if you need to let of some steam, load up your amiga emulator, boot swiv or xenon megablast and have a go at it, if you need a human victim, target me... but go easy on eachother!

viewtopic.php?t=11865&start=15
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6166
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:

Post by blueznl »

anyway...

regarding the subject: number of users? sign an nda and ask fred

regarding your lib: sounds interesting, show me your lib ie. results, i prefer both (dll as well as lib due to future compatibility) and if it's cheap enough i perhaps buy it (although i rarely rely on external code, i think the only three dll's i thus far used where winsock.dll, user32.dll and wintab.dll :-))

if you expect to make *a* *lot* of money, hmm, i doubt that the average purebasic user will bring out the hard cash for a few buttons :-) what price did you have in mind?
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
Post Reply