Is "Compile with/without Debugger" supposed to also Run, or can it be considered a bug?
Would be useful for a tool like this (at least on Mac)
Compile w/o Run?
Re: Compile w/o Run?
Yes. It's always done that for me. Yours doesn't?
Re: Compile w/o Run?
IMHO, it shouldn't, because there is Run (and Compile/Run)… and compiling only can be useful (the two Compile-Only should also be included as triggering event for IDE tools)
Re: Compile w/o Run?
Oh, I see what you mean. We have "Compile/Run" (or F5) that includes the debugger, but then "Compile with debugger" also does that. Never noticed before.
Re: Compile w/o Run?
Yes, "Compile/Run" depends on the check on the "Use Debugger" menu, or on the status of the Debugger "button" on toolbar…
So I think this can be called a bug, and I also hope it will be easy to implement the triggering events for IDE tools (I think making the existing "Compile/Run" events to work also with compile-only would suffice)
So I think this can be called a bug, and I also hope it will be easy to implement the triggering events for IDE tools (I think making the existing "Compile/Run" events to work also with compile-only would suffice)
-
- Addict
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 4:21 pm
- Location: USoA
Re: Compile w/o Run?
Yeah, I never really paid any attention to those options myself. I am so used to using the compile/run and use debugger icons in the toolbar. Those options in the system menu are just extraneous items for me. Only thing I need in that menu is 'compiler options' and 'create executable'.BarryG wrote: Sat Sep 20, 2025 2:42 am Oh, I see what you mean. We have "Compile/Run" (or F5) that includes the debugger, but then "Compile with debugger" also does that. Never noticed before.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Randy
I *never* claimed to be a programmer.
Randy
I *never* claimed to be a programmer.