The house, the toilet bowl, and the golf ball.
Re: The house, the toilet bowl, and the golf ball.
The really interesting here is that Olli, somehow, falls asleep for ~11 months and as soon as we have November he comes back and adds 234523 words to that crude thread and then is gone again until next year November.
{Home}.:|:.{Dialog Design0R}.:|:.{Codes}.:|:.{History Viewer Online}.:|:.{Send a Beer}
Re: The house, the toilet bowl, and the golf ball.
HeXOR wrote:234523 words
In which duration ?
Re: The house, the toilet bowl, and the golf ball.
I can't play, it's a white hole
Re: The house, the toilet bowl, and the golf ball.
Okay... Mea culpa : the very long distance should not exceed any hundreds of billions years-light. Else somebody will add the mass to the toilet bowl, representing the main dark hole, in order to correct the events horizons altitude of this main dark hole.Olli wrote:... from the events horizon, a very long fall, a very long acceleration, through a very long distance of any thousand of billions years-light...
Re: The house, the toilet bowl, and the golf ball.
I have inserted an intro, and I have added the real scientific limits. I complete them here again :
1) we cannot see anything over the distance of 15 000 000 000 years light.
2) we cannot see anything, behind (or inside) the black events horizon of a black hole.
3) we cannot see anything before the birth of the universe, more accurately, we cannot see anything before the 600 000 years which have followed the birth of the universe.
It is for the hardies which have read everything in the subject : I have well in mind I passed over these 3 essential real limits. It is just I have difficulties to imagine any scientists accept to pass over the speed of light (10^x * c, it is a lot, just 2 * c, ok), to describe the birth of the universe which is based by the light.
1) we cannot see anything over the distance of 15 000 000 000 years light.
2) we cannot see anything, behind (or inside) the black events horizon of a black hole.
3) we cannot see anything before the birth of the universe, more accurately, we cannot see anything before the 600 000 years which have followed the birth of the universe.
It is for the hardies which have read everything in the subject : I have well in mind I passed over these 3 essential real limits. It is just I have difficulties to imagine any scientists accept to pass over the speed of light (10^x * c, it is a lot, just 2 * c, ok), to describe the birth of the universe which is based by the light.
Re: The house, the toilet bowl, and the golf ball.
I discovered today, that a scientific study from Super-Kamiokande seems to cancel the hypothesis I tried to explain, about the neutrinos, in this subject.
I am curious to know the characteristics of this study...
I am curious to know the characteristics of this study...
Re: The house, the toilet bowl, and the golf ball.
That is again a lil bit light. Just a 160*100 pixels screen... Sure eaxh pixel is very accurate, far more than a 24 bits color. But even if it was 256 bits per pixel in this astrophysical receiver device, this would not give real details about neutrinos...
An other point of view I read before is about passing the events horizon of a dark hole. It seams that nothing would happen if we pass this virtual limit.
In my humble opinion, I imagine the opposite : we would approach to black round object, and when we reach the virtual limit of the events horizon, the GEIGER device detects a massive emitting. And we are falling from the top of a huge rays rain... The intensity of this dangerous rain depends from the size of the dark hole. More it is small, more it is dangerous...
An other point of view I read before is about passing the events horizon of a dark hole. It seams that nothing would happen if we pass this virtual limit.
In my humble opinion, I imagine the opposite : we would approach to black round object, and when we reach the virtual limit of the events horizon, the GEIGER device detects a massive emitting. And we are falling from the top of a huge rays rain... The intensity of this dangerous rain depends from the size of the dark hole. More it is small, more it is dangerous...
Re: The house, the toilet bowl, and the golf ball.
I said here the particles named "OMG" are, for me an evidence our universe is in a big dark hole.
I think, continuing to get more and more informations about OMG particles, any scientists will be able to sort them in two families :
- the direct OMG particles; born under the event horizons;
- the ballistic OMG particles; born over the event horizons.
Have a very nice time.
I think, continuing to get more and more informations about OMG particles, any scientists will be able to sort them in two families :
- the direct OMG particles; born under the event horizons;
- the ballistic OMG particles; born over the event horizons.
Have a very nice time.
Re: The house, the toilet bowl, and the golf ball.
Ooosh my friend ! I received a scientific KO there : an 6-years advance resumed in this movie.
Are we living in a black hole ?
So, my friends, be careful ! The author of this movie is a big person, compared to me. No link between us. His work is science, while my work is absolutely not science.
However, if you have question about the details of this movie, I think I am able to answer, to such questions.
I am not a scientist. It is a very hard work. What I think about science is beautiful, but I think that, because one of them have found the words to teach their concepts.
Nice watch !
Are we living in a black hole ?
So, my friends, be careful ! The author of this movie is a big person, compared to me. No link between us. His work is science, while my work is absolutely not science.
However, if you have question about the details of this movie, I think I am able to answer, to such questions.
I am not a scientist. It is a very hard work. What I think about science is beautiful, but I think that, because one of them have found the words to teach their concepts.
Nice watch !