
Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
We're working on it 

Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
What I've learned from this video is that Fred is named Fred Couille on YouTube.
Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
Thank you, Marc56usMarc56us wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:48 pm[Done] for English and French page.
"Since version 6.00 (June 2022), in addition to compilation using ASM, PureBasic offers compilation with a C backend. This enables access to new platforms (e.g. Raspberry) and should make it easier to add new libraries in the future. "
Feel free to do it for others languages pages and/or suggest better text
![]()
Nice, looking forward to it

Et cetera is my worst enemy
Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
Great to have rhe follow up.

Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
I didn't catch what Fred said at 3:14, "PureBasic which is mostly based on ______" ?
Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
Blitz Basic (I think ?)PBJim wrote: Wed Apr 16, 2025 11:57 am I didn't catch what Fred said at 3:14, "PureBasic which is mostly based on ______" ?

Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
OMG, this is awesome. Thanks Fred and Mike!
Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
Yes, it's BlitzBasicPBJim wrote: Wed Apr 16, 2025 11:57 am I didn't catch what Fred said at 3:14, "PureBasic which is mostly based on ______" ?
Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
It's so interesting to finally hear Fred's voice after all these years, I guess to me as a blind person it's like seeing a picture for sighted people. My voice profile was pretty close honestly, but I had his accent way wrong. Thanks again for doing this Fred, it's been such a great year for interviews on the PB side so far 

Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
Next one in 10 years 

Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
By then, PB will be running on 9 more platforms at this rate

Re: Mike Shah's PureBasic - First Impression
Thanks for the interview Fred
I had some old questions triggered by the interview.
1. With PB Variable.type syntax, is there hesitance to expand the data types?
Specifically, unsigned integer, unsigned quad.
Would you allow 2 char types?
MyInt.ui or MyQuad.uq
Or pick from the available 26 letters? j is i+1 and r is next from q?
MyusInt.j or MyusQuad.r
2. While I admire the effort to support gui's in each OS, was there any consideration to choosing 1 for all OS's?
Does GTK work for all OS?
3. With the push for webview gui's, do you see SpiderBasic competing with PureBasic?

I had some old questions triggered by the interview.
1. With PB Variable.type syntax, is there hesitance to expand the data types?
Specifically, unsigned integer, unsigned quad.
Would you allow 2 char types?
MyInt.ui or MyQuad.uq
Or pick from the available 26 letters? j is i+1 and r is next from q?
MyusInt.j or MyusQuad.r
2. While I admire the effort to support gui's in each OS, was there any consideration to choosing 1 for all OS's?
Does GTK work for all OS?
3. With the push for webview gui's, do you see SpiderBasic competing with PureBasic?
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum