PB 6.11b3 slower than 6.10?

[marcoagpinto]

Heya,

I was conducting some speed tests in my PhD software.

I had the official release compiled with PB 6.10, and I have a build under development compiled with 6.11 beta 3.

I have been optimising the source code of my software, and the speed tests indicated that the software (official release) compiled with 6.10 took less time to perform the 20 runs than my optimised code (under development) compiled with 6.11.

I am so sad as I spent hours optimising the source-code.

[infratec]

Are you talking about 1% or xx%

[marcoagpinto]

Are you talking about 1% or xx%

You have known me for years, so you are right, I am talking about 1%.

[marcoagpinto]

Are you talking about 1% or xx%

Yes, I was counting the seconds of the 20 runs.

[infratec]

2 answeres and I still don't know how large the difference is.

If it is really 1% it makes no sense to talk about it.

[marcoagpinto]

2 answeres and I still don't know how large the difference is.

If it is really 1% it makes no sense to talk about it.

The difference is around 20 seconds.

I can't remember the exact time, but for example, 20 runs in 6.10 would take 16m30s, and now it takes 16m10s even with my code optimisations.

EDIT: the opposite, it took 16:10 and now it takes 16:30.

[Fred]

I'm sorry but we can't do anything with this bug report, we need more precise info about the real timing etc. The C compiler didn't changed in 6.11 so it would be surprising to have any difference.

[marcoagpinto]

I'm sorry but we can't do anything with this bug report, we need more precise info about the real timing etc. The C compiler didn't changed in 6.11 so it would be surprising to have any difference.

@Fred, okay, please close this bug report.

I will do more code optimisations, and the extra speed will fix that for me.

No worries.