https://www.whitehouse.gov/oncd/briefin ... f-support/
Kinda throwing this out there for developers of pure basic and their response to this?????
Statements of Support for Software Measurability and Memory Safety
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:06 pm
-
- Addict
- Posts: 2345
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Statements of Support for Software Measurability and Memory Safety
I'm occasionally reading fefe's blog. Of course it will not solve everything, but it helps. Still, the object lifetime management in Rust is so strict that even something simple like a globally available file cache could be problematic and requires unsafe stuff.
Aaaannnddd there is cve-rs
.
Besides all that, standards have been developed for other languages. E.g. MISRA-C, MISRA-Rust is still under development. And look at the packages available for rust, plenty haven't even reached version 1.0.0, yet and the interfaces change all the time.
Aaaannnddd there is cve-rs
Besides all that, standards have been developed for other languages. E.g. MISRA-C, MISRA-Rust is still under development. And look at the packages available for rust, plenty haven't even reached version 1.0.0, yet and the interfaces change all the time.
bye,
Daniel
Daniel
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:06 pm
Re: Statements of Support for Software Measurability and Memory Safety
Well seen to be saying c and c++ for people stop developing in those languages due to insecurity in memory and in other news reports. Waiting on Fred chime in on this one???
-
- Addict
- Posts: 2345
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Statements of Support for Software Measurability and Memory Safety
I don't think it'll fit PureBasic at all. I mean C, C++ also don't introduce Rust like concepts now, it would break literally everything that has already been written.ehowington wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 3:00 pm Well seen to be saying c and c++ for people stop developing in those languages due to insecurity in memory and in other news reports. Waiting on Fred chime in on this one???
Look at all the other languages and systems in the past like VBA, VBS, JavaScript, did we stop using them or abandon them because computers have been infected with their help? It took ages for Flash and Java applets to disappear and for sure not because they were a security risk.
bye,
Daniel
Daniel
Re: Statements of Support for Software Measurability and Memory Safety
If using the C backend I guess it is possible to leverage the different built in sanitizers to achieve some sort memory safety.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/48902567
https://stackoverflow.com/a/48902567
-
- Addict
- Posts: 2345
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Statements of Support for Software Measurability and Memory Safety
But as you said these are just to achieve "some sort of" memory safety and they're runtime checkers, you have to run your program, run into errors and still have to fix the bugs yourself.tored wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2024 2:20 am If using the C backend I guess it is possible to leverage the different built in sanitizers to achieve some sort memory safety.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/48902567
bye,
Daniel
Daniel