Skin/Theme Engine...Free?

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...

Should we offer our skin engine free for freeware developers?

Yes, free-versions are always good for exposure.
46
47%
Yes, free-versions are always good for exposure.
46
47%
No! Nag-screens encourage people to buy a license.
3
3%
No! Nag-screens encourage people to buy a license.
3
3%
 
Total votes: 98

PolyVector
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 9:17 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Skin/Theme Engine...Free?

Post by PolyVector »

Hello everyone,
Some friends and I are starting up a software company called SkunkSoft. We're deep in development with a number of projects... One of our projects is a skin/theme engine dll for developers that's similar to ActiveSkin(discontinued) and SkinMagic(very slow)...

Our problem is that nobody has heard of us and we're going to need some good advertising/exposure... Now, I have absolutly no experience with this so I have a question for you all...

Would it be better for us to release this engine as being 100% free for freeware developers (to get our name out there?)
Or would it only encourage piracy if there is no trial/popup-message?

Any ideas you could offer would be a great help! Thanks!
User avatar
tinman
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 1102
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 4:56 pm
Location: Level 5 of Robot Hell
Contact:

Post by tinman »

You could also think about the sales model which MUI used?
If you paint your butt blue and glue the hole shut you just themed your ass but lost the functionality.
(WinXPhSP3 PB5.20b14)
PolyVector
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 9:17 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Post by PolyVector »

Interesting... That's similar to what I had in mind... Only better :)
I'll look further into that method :)
PolyVector
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 9:17 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Post by PolyVector »

Anyone else have a suggestion?
Karbon
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 1:42 am
Location: Ashland, KY
Contact:

Post by Karbon »

If the skin engine is good then releasing it to the several hundred developer oriented download sites will generate a lot of interest (don't release it until it is or you'll get a bad reputation!). I've found download.com to be *well* worth the $99 a month and some selective google adwords can be worth the money - especially for such a niche group of people.

Join the ASP (www.asp-shareware.org) as well and offer members a discount - virtually every member is a developer.

I would not release it as freeware if you plan on charging for use in the future. Price it low and offer upgrades for free to users that register during the initial roll out - then move the price up and upgrade features down as it gains popularity.

Good luck!
-Mitchell
Check out kBilling for all your billing software needs!
http://www.k-billing.com
Code Signing / Authenticode Certificates (Get rid of those Unknown Publisher warnings!)
http://codesigning.ksoftware.net
PolyVector
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 9:17 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Post by PolyVector »

@Karbon, I wasn't planning on releasing it 'free at first'... I was thinking more along the lines of 'free for freeware developers'
The way I see it, a freeware developer isn't going to pay for a skin engine anyways, so why not let them advertise for me :)

But if you think that's a bad idea, you're more-or-less an athority on the subject... so I'll reconsider... :oops:

Thanks :D
Karbon
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 1:42 am
Location: Ashland, KY
Contact:

Post by Karbon »

PolyVector wrote:But if you think that's a bad idea, you're more-or-less an athority on the subject... so I'll reconsider... :oops:

Thanks :D
Hahahah!

I'm no authority!

A pay for commercial use license might be a good idea - I've never tried to sell development tools so I can't really say! You are right though - why not let freeware authors advertise for you!
-Mitchell
Check out kBilling for all your billing software needs!
http://www.k-billing.com
Code Signing / Authenticode Certificates (Get rid of those Unknown Publisher warnings!)
http://codesigning.ksoftware.net
PolyVector
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 9:17 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Post by PolyVector »

Well, you are 'Elite' 8)

Anybody else have thoughts on the subject?
Karbon
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 1:42 am
Location: Ashland, KY
Contact:

Post by Karbon »

bwhahahahaha

Elite just means I have a big mouth (and fast fingers)..

Good luck!
-Mitchell
Check out kBilling for all your billing software needs!
http://www.k-billing.com
Code Signing / Authenticode Certificates (Get rid of those Unknown Publisher warnings!)
http://codesigning.ksoftware.net
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

you could also make it free for all pb developers :D
PolyVector
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 9:17 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Post by PolyVector »

I could, but I'm ghetto poor :D
PolyVector
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 9:17 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Post by PolyVector »

So far, my license-in-progress is similar to MUI:

Free for all freeware development...
It'll cost something if you use it in a commercial(or ad-supported) product.

I'm thinking of keeping it free for some commercial projects...
The rule of thumb will probably be: If the program is intended to aid in development, and our skin engine isn't used to simply make the tool look good, it will be free...
For example, a visual designer could use it commercially for free...
Another example would be a replacement skin-designer.
User Mike
User
User
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 7:06 pm

Post by User Mike »

Well, as far as the situation goes just try to Keep it Simple (Stupid ;)).

Free for freeware developers and then a set dollar amount for those who want to launch their program commercially.

8)

[EDIT] Free updates would also look great.
-Pure Basic User and loving it!-
PolyVector
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 9:17 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Post by PolyVector »

@Mike
Maybe you're right... I'll just keep it simple then! 8)
Updates will always be free... I hate companies that charge for bug-fixes....
User Mike
User
User
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 7:06 pm

Post by User Mike »

Yeah, free-updates are something that must always be allowed. When peolpe buy software, they expect it to be workable as soon as they get it.

As far as people distributing applications with your program you can do something very simple. Have a watermark that shows up in their programs before they start. If they want that watermark removed they can pay a fee(Either per product, or for life) that removes it.

This way you get free advertisement, developers who have a free software, and can make profit along the way.

Just my suggustion of how I might do it. (Watermark is also a good way to not worry about people distributing applications commercially without you knowing it. And if they do, well, you'll still get free advertisement. ;))

:)
-Pure Basic User and loving it!-
Post Reply