Purebasic with debugger Mcaffee blocks

Just starting out? Need help? Post your questions and find answers here.
HPW
User
User
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 6:48 pm
Location: Germany

Purebasic with debugger Mcaffee blocks

Post by HPW »

Hello,

When I test with any example with compile/start with enabled Debugger, my Mcaffee real-time protection blocks the exe.
First comes a message that purebasic cannot use the internal Debugger and then Mcaffee Pops up about isolating purebasic_compilation0.exe with a GenericRXCL...... Virus.

What can I do?

Regards
Hans-Peter
Dude
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1907
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:49 pm

Re: Purebasic with debugger Mcaffee blocks

Post by Dude »

You need to add PureBasic.exe and its related files to McAfee's white list.
HPW
User
User
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 6:48 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Purebasic with debugger Mcaffee blocks

Post by HPW »

Hello,

I have purebasic.exe in my whitelist.
What do you mean by 'related files'?
I can not configure Mcaffee to exculde a Folder from realtime-protection.
And it complains about the temp-exe.

Regards
Hans-Peter
Dude
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1907
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:49 pm

Re: Purebasic with debugger Mcaffee blocks

Post by Dude »

Related files are "purebasic_compilation0.exe", etc. Why can't you configure McAfee to ignore PureBasic's folder? That should be a basic feature of any good AV software. Or is McAfee that bad?
HPW
User
User
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 6:48 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Purebasic with debugger Mcaffee blocks

Post by HPW »

Hello,

>>purebasic_compilation0.exe

Ok, but it is not practical to enter each new testfile in every related path into the Whitelist which can be only done from admin account.

And you can not set Folders to exclude from the real time protection. You can only do it for Virus scans. So it is that bad.

Regards
Hans-Peter
Little John
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4777
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Purebasic with debugger Mcaffee blocks

Post by Little John »

HPW wrote:Ok, but it is not practical to enter each new testfile in every related path into the Whitelist
Image

If the marked option is not checked (like on the above picture), then the temporary executables (PureBasic_Compilation0.exe, PureBasic_Compilation1.exe etc.) are all created in the %temp% directory. Putting these files on the whitelist shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Dude
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1907
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:49 pm

Re: Purebasic with debugger Mcaffee blocks

Post by Dude »

HPW wrote:it is not practical to enter each new testfile in every related path into the Whitelist
You can always wildcard them in your AV with an asterisk at the end, to cover all possibilities:

Code: Select all

C:\Users\[UserName]\AppData\Local\Temp\PureBasic_Compilation*
I've done this with Avast, and I never get a warning when compiling my apps.

If McAfee is any good, it should have the functionality to wildcard files as well.
Bitblazer
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 761
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:17 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Purebasic with debugger Mcaffee blocks

Post by Bitblazer »

Dude wrote:I've done this with Avast, and I never get a warning when compiling my apps.
Kaspersky is also fully compatible with Purebasic development and always ranked among the top products in antivirus tests.
User avatar
blueb
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1111
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 2:15 pm
Location: Cuernavaca, Mexico

Re: Purebasic with debugger Mcaffee blocks

Post by blueb »

... Kaspersky is also fully compatible with Purebasic development and always ranked among the top products in antivirus tests.
I've used Kaspersky for perhaps 5 years and have found it very reliable and trouble free. :D
- It was too lonely at the top.

System : PB 6.21(x64) and Win 11 Pro (x64)
Hardware: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X w/64 gigs Ram, AMD RX 6950 XT Graphics w/16gigs Mem
Post Reply