[5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
I can't say I like this change. I can't get ProGUI to work correctly in 5.60 Beta 1. The static control covers up the Rebar. Is it not possible to calculate the inner area without the static control?
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
Exactly my point! I don't think any developer of a 3rd party library expects such a behavior. Therefore internal calculations just return bogus values.
@Fred: I can think of a few situations where the new gadget container could be indeed pretty helpful, but PLEASE!!! make it optional. Launching OpenWindow() with #PB_Window_GadgetList seems already logical... WIN WIN
I stop whining now ^^
@Fred: I can think of a few situations where the new gadget container could be indeed pretty helpful, but PLEASE!!! make it optional. Launching OpenWindow() with #PB_Window_GadgetList seems already logical... WIN WIN
I stop whining now ^^
Et cetera is my worst enemy
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
I cannot agree with the demise of the toolbar and statusbar. They are extremely useful as a baseline gui with minimal intrusion upon real estate. And with subclassing, you can reap the statusbar events.
I'm waiting to see the resize options with the next beta before modifying my gui code.
I'm waiting to see the resize options with the next beta before modifying my gui code.
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
IdeasVacuum wrote:StatusBar is unnecessary for most apps.
-
IdeasVacuum
- Always Here

- Posts: 6426
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:33 am
- Location: Wales, UK
- Contact:
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
It's not about demise skywalk, it's about their elevation in importance being too expensive and unnecessary.I cannot agree with the demise of the toolbar and statusbar.
IdeasVacuum
If it sounds simple, you have not grasped the complexity.
If it sounds simple, you have not grasped the complexity.
-
IdeasVacuum
- Always Here

- Posts: 6426
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:33 am
- Location: Wales, UK
- Contact:
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
Dude, tool bar and status bar are not going to be removed and nobody has suggested that they should be, not even jokingly. Please read the whole post before commenting on it.
If only hundreds of apps (out of millions) use the status bar, I suspect this is because it is just too ugly for a modern-day app. When I need to display data (that would be the status bar's job), I generally use text gadgets instead.
If only hundreds of apps (out of millions) use the status bar, I suspect this is because it is just too ugly for a modern-day app. When I need to display data (that would be the status bar's job), I generally use text gadgets instead.
IdeasVacuum
If it sounds simple, you have not grasped the complexity.
If it sounds simple, you have not grasped the complexity.
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
After some thoughs, we will revert this change completely as I have overlooked some complex cases. So long for those hard days of work ! 
- netmaestro
- PureBasic Bullfrog

- Posts: 8452
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:42 am
- Location: Fort Nelson, BC, Canada
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
I know the feeling Fred, and I sympathize. But you're making the right move now and it's appreciated, by more than just me.
BERESHEIT
-
IdeasVacuum
- Always Here

- Posts: 6426
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:33 am
- Location: Wales, UK
- Contact:
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
Here here netmaestro.
You are doing a brilliant job Fred and deserve all credit for it. To roll-back the change is best for all imho.
You are doing a brilliant job Fred and deserve all credit for it. To roll-back the change is best for all imho.
IdeasVacuum
If it sounds simple, you have not grasped the complexity.
If it sounds simple, you have not grasped the complexity.
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
Wow, that shows of true size. Just admit that something has not been done well. This is a property that many people have forgotten todayFred wrote:After some thoughs, we will revert this change completely as I have overlooked some complex cases. So long for those hard days of work !
.
sorry for my bad english
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
Thank you very very much, Fred! I really appreciate your decision 
Et cetera is my worst enemy
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
Thank you, Fred. It is appreciated. I did like the fact that the toolbar/status bar sizes were automatically subtracted from the inner area of the window, but I did feel it could have been done in a better way. I hate that your work was undone, but I know it's for the best. Thank you for all your hard work!
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
Thanks Fred,
This is what beta implies.
No worries.
Just work.
This is what beta implies.
No worries.
Just work.
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
My thanks will be delivered via PayPal Fred.
The PayPal button is somehow hidden all the way to the bottom of downloads section.
Don't forget to scroll down when you download the latest beta and send Fred a cup of coffee!
Thank you.
Norm.
The PayPal button is somehow hidden all the way to the bottom of downloads section.
Don't forget to scroll down when you download the latest beta and send Fred a cup of coffee!
Thank you.
Norm.
google Translate;Makes my jokes fall flat- Fait mes blagues tombent à plat- Machte meine Witze verpuffen- Eh cumpari ci vo sunari
Re: [5.60b1] Static control over client area?!
With beta2, I can not use this toolbar, statusbar, menu with dialoglib. This is better? 
PureBasic 5.73 | SpiderBasic 2.30 | Windows 10 Pro (x64) | Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.



