Mistrel wrote:Your request is very confusing; as is your example. I would highly recommend rethinking your course of logic.
Of course you are right, the first three lines have unfortunately been duplicated somehow. Otherwise, the example should be clear and I think that the one it affects has understood what it is all about.
I would strongly recommend that you consider your way here in the forum, that you always have to comment on everything, whether you understood what it is or not, no matter if you have something to contribute or not.
You are requesting a change in the way the compiler works. I am just giving you a workaround until your change is implemented.
People are not trying to be rude.... it is google translate who is at fault here!
Norm.
google Translate;Makes my jokes fall flat- Fait mes blagues tombent à plat- Machte meine Witze verpuffen- Eh cumpari ci vo sunari
first of all, thank you for your mediation. Although I do not like it normally, if a answered post is changed, I have removed the lines as recommended by you.
There are always several ways to reach the same goal. Your code suggestion is from a completely different approach, but it is a quite usual method to override certain functions by macro and this would simplify by my suggestion in some cases the code.
As I wished many years ago undefineMacro, no one has screamed, we need, rather the opposite. For some years now we have this feature now and when I google to 'Purebasic undefineMacro', then I suddenly get 452 results, although at that time apparently nobody found it useful.