What if matter is just a bubble of a magnetic wave?

[Joakim Christiansen]

This is just me using my fantasy to explore a concept which may not be possible, but if we could develop it into a working theory (for the physics around us) it could become a sexy one.

I see the universe as a sea of magnetic potential, yes that it has a potential to hold any magnetic value and that this is a property of space itself. What I mean by that is that I believe that light or so called "electro-magnetic waves" should rather just be called magnetic waves and that every part of the universe has a magnetic property that can be either neutral, negative or positive (of different strengths). Hence a magnetic wave can travel through it since it changes those properties of space while moving through it (and would leave it back into its neutral state).

So like bubbles in water (not really), what if matter is just a bubble of a magnetic wave? Maybe in certain conditions a wave can have a perfectly round or gapless surface where the magnetic forces is holding it together not allowing it to "wave out" like it would normally do.

This bubble would then for example have an outside of + and an inside of -, basically its outside is like a magnet with only one pole then. As we know different poles attracts (+ and - would be dragged towards each other) while same poles pushes away (+ and + or - and - would push each other away).

So let's say that we have a + bubble, a bubble with an outside pole of positive and another bubble would happen to come near it. Let's say that this other bubble is a smaller - bubble and since it was attracted to it it ended up orbiting it, like the earth is orbiting the sun (which the earth is attracted to). Suddenly we have something that is similar to a hydrogen atom, but maybe it isn't, maybe an atom is an even more advanced configuration of magnetic bubbles (I'm not saying that I have all this figured out yet).

Anyway... Let's say that this bubble with a another bubble orbiting it suddenly comes in contact with a opposite bubble-configuration (yeah, bear with me). A opposite bubble-configuration would mean a - bubble with a smaller + orbiting it. What would happen? I think that the two big bubbles would have a possibility of being pulled into each other instead of maintaining a orbit around each other and that the same could happen with the two smaller bubbles. I also think that such collisions would possible burst the "bubble state" of the magnetic waves, releasing them. So basically converting matter (bubble state) to energy (magnetic waves) and sending it out in every direction.

So what do we have here? Something similar to a matter and antimatter collision?

And also if a bubble or several smashes hard into other bubbles I do believe that lots of smaller other bubbles could emerge from the mess of magnetic waves released (some collapsing into bubbles). Is this not what we see at CERN?

And how would advanced bubble configurations interact with each other? Could behavior similar to atoms actually be possible? Would we need to program a simulator to test out this theory? Do more properties need to be added for it all to work?

Why not try to figure out an alternative theory of physics? The one we have I do believe is based on a lot of misunderstandings of experiments, together with tweaking of math until it sorta works. But remember, both 6+4 and 2+8 equals 10...

[Joakim Christiansen]

Continuation...

In the text below I replace the term bubble with just + and - for bubbles of those outside poles.

So how are several atoms hold together?

Let's explore one scenario, let's sat we have a + parent with - children (parent meaning bigger than the children) around it. The children of course all orbits it and will not collide with each other since they would just push the other children out of the way.

And then we have another parent, but one of - with + children orbiting it (antimatter?). This parent could have come into an orbit around the other parent since they attract, for now it stays far away enough for the children to not also be pulled towards the other parents children.

But how would not many of these just collide, how could many hold themselves near each other without colliding? I don't know, maybe that would not be possible since the attraction would be too great and nothing is making them keep their distances from each other? Is this just a recipe for matter and antimatter collision?

Another scenario is two + parents with both - children being near each other because the parents are attracted to the children of each other? Could that cancel out their urge to push away from each other? Would that act as the kind of glue I need to hold my fantasy atoms together?

If it does, could children in some conditions jump from one parent to another acting like our understanding of electrons?

[Joakim Christiansen]

Continuation...

What about radioactive decay? Is it weird that a parent with lots of children could be a bloody mess?

So if waves in some situations can collapse into bubbles...

Does this explain the wave–particle duality of light?

Does this explain the collapse of the wave function?

Does it explain the double slit experiments?

[jack]

hello Joakim Christiansen
Gabriel LaFreniere has a very interesting theory about Matter being made of waves http://www.mysearch.org.uk/website3/Index.htm

[BasicallyPure]

Hi,
Do a search on 'Existics' by Gavin Wince if you've never heard of it.
I doubt if it's a correct theory but interesting nevertheless.
Most of it is over my head and I can't follow much of the math.

It's been a while since I've watched any of the videos but I seem to
remember that part of the theory anyway is that there are three
dimensions of space and three dimensions of time.
Our path through time is just the vector sum of the three time dimensions.

He tries to use his theory to explain the relativistic effects of time dilation
in a different way than Einstein. He seems to have ideas on how his theory
can explain many other things as well.

I don't see a lot of physicists jumping onto his theory so it's probably wrong,
But even a wrong theory can inspire someone to come up with a better one.

[Joakim Christiansen]

hello Joakim Christiansen
Gabriel LaFreniere has a very interesting theory about Matter being made of waves http://www.rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_ ... matter.htm

Thank you, that is interesting! I will read that!

What fascinates me with the thought of matter being a wave in a special state is how simple the basic physics would be. Kinda like how basic a transistor is, but still it can create as advanced structures as your CPU... I will not say that I know the truth about anything, but I do love to explore alternate explanations or ideas for EVERYTHING in life. So I will explore the idea for as long as it keeps entertaining me.

But even a wrong theory can inspire someone to come up with a better one.

That is my view also!
Thank you for your input.

[Joakim Christiansen]

I came by this funny dude also, I like the way he dislikes the current theories.
Looks like he has several videos on the subject, I will explore them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuUTABLz1Vk

[Thorium]

the thought of matter being a wave in a special state

This is a very well accepted theory, quantum theory. Basicly, a partical in the state of a super position is a wave.

The problem is that particals act as waves and as particals in different states. Thats what makes it so complex but brilliant at the same time. If you think about how the state of particals is only be determined if they interact, it sounds very much like a optimization a programer would do if he developes a simulation.