rebrand Windows 9 as Windows XP 9

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
applePi
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:28 pm

rebrand Windows 9 as Windows XP 9

Post by applePi »

rebrand Windows 9 as Windows XP 9
this is the best advice to microsoft i read until now: go down this page:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/opi ... -windows-9
also read this in a new article: Windows XP isn't going to disappear in 10 days:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/opi ... in-10-days
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/pol ... -life-poll
the xp users needs a new support for the multi cores cpu and for the new hardware but they prefer to stay in xp mode. and they will buy immediately windows xp 9
could a miracle change microsoft mind to provide several versions of windows 9 :the same internal engine but with different modes ! .
User avatar
heartbone
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2013 1:55 pm
Location: just outside of Ferguson

Re: rebrand Windows 9 as Windows XP 9

Post by heartbone »

If true then Microsoft certainly has changed culture, and would likely curtail the growth of Linux.

Previous reports on the matter indicated that Windows 9 might become completely free for a wider array of users, including Windows 8 and Window 7 customers, but there were also some voices indicating that Microsoft could go as far as making this release free of charge even for XP adopters.

I hope that they don't forget we the unfortunate victims of the Vista abomination, I'd for sure upgrade.
Keep it BASIC.
IdeasVacuum
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 6426
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:33 am
Location: Wales, UK
Contact:

Re: rebrand Windows 9 as Windows XP 9

Post by IdeasVacuum »

maybe Microsoft needs to think of a way to repackage its next OS in a Windows XP wrapper. It should rebrand Windows 9 as Windows XP 9, and whoever gets the new CEO role needs to get Microsoft's software engineers working on a back-to-basics version for the next OS release, merging the best of Windows XP with the faster performance offered by today's more modern hardware.
That's exactly what is required.
IdeasVacuum
If it sounds simple, you have not grasped the complexity.
Post Reply