Fred wrote:Well, don't get it wrong: it's not a language to replace PureBasic.......We will indeed continue PureBasic development, it's not the end of the road as some suggests. We have the time to handle both, don't worry. It will also help to forge new commands for PureBasic to make it stronger.
Hi Fred
We write business applications and, without exception, our customers are unanimous in NOT wanting their corporate data sitting on the Internet. So, like some others here, I'm concerned about PureBasic's future. In particular, there are still some critical bugs in 5.21 LTS that need fixing.
I've always believed that professional programmers should look after their customer base and fix bugs before adding new features. PureBasic is a powerful and flexible language, and we enjoy working with it. What makes me nervous is that we have 500,000 lines of code that will only run on 5.20 LTS -- and now I'm seeing new products, not 5.21 LTS bug fixes.
Rod
For ten years Caesar ruled with an iron hand, then with a wooden foot, and finally with a piece of string.
~ Spike Milligan